Trading Secrets
JUNE 22, 2022
This exception allows a buyer to enforce non-compete agreements against a seller if the seller is an “owner of a business entity selling or otherwise disposing of all of his or her ownership interests in the business entity.”. The joint venture was formalized over a five-day period in April 2011. In Blue Mountain Enterprises, LLC v.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 24, 2024
Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. However, the appellate court seems to invalidate that six-factor test: “Determining he ownership of social-media accounts is indeed a relatively novel exercise, but that novelty does not warrant a new six-factor test.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
Typically, in the case of scholarly publications, authors are publicly funded through payment under a standing contract with a university or research institute, or through project funding, including EU funding. Copyright in a work made for hire resides in the author of the work, unless the commission contract provides otherwise.
SpicyIP
MAY 4, 2023
The Proviso added to Section 17 prescribes that the rights of an author of original literary, dramatic, and musical work will be unaffected by the Producer’s ownership of the copyright in a cinematographic film and ownership of the employer on the work made under a contract of employment. 2011) (see here for Prof.
CopyrightsWorld
FEBRUARY 10, 2021
This article is part of our series showcasing well-known copyright ownership cases from the music and film industries, technology, and more. This week’s post looks at three well-known copyright infringement cases involving tech giants battling each other over ownership rights. Apple vs. Microsoft. However, Windows 2.0
43(B)log
DECEMBER 26, 2022
AKF contracted with two corporate defendants to be AKF’s third-party fulfillment intermediaries for several hundred thousand units of disposable vaping devices, batteries and related goods. But the distribution right does not include “the mere transportation of goods without a transfer or sale of ownership interest in the goods.”
The IPKat
DECEMBER 5, 2022
The decision considered whether the UK courts are able to hear a dispute over whether royalties are due under a US patent in view of a contract governed by US law (G W Pharma v Otsuka, [2022] EWCA Civ 1462 ). There is also an exception to the Moçambique principle for claims which relate to a contract.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content