article thumbnail

Conundrum Involving The Ownership Of The Work Created By Ai

IP and Legal Filings

Firstly, work generated from AI with input, in this case command is given by the human or programmer and get output out of it with the help of their creative and innovative ideas hence the ownership and authorship can be ascribed to the human who has given innovative inputs to the AI. Issues There are many issues in granting ownership to AI.

article thumbnail

512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. Zoox

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This paradigm, however, breaks down when copyright ownership is contested. In that circumstance, the takedown notice becomes a proxy battle for a larger and likely fact-dependent war over ownership, which the service in the middle isn’t in a good position to resolve. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Other ‘Maybe’ Authors: Copyright Ownership for AI Trainers

IP Intelligence

Combine that “mastermind/dominant” author doctrine with the run of cases discussing ownership of software outputs (i.e., Copyright Office (the Office) when it comes to copyright ownership of artificial intelligence (AI) output. the “lion’s share” cases), and we see that the notion of what an “author” even is is highly nuanced.

article thumbnail

The Other ‘Maybe’ Authors: Copyright Ownership for AI Trainers

LexBlog IP

Combine that “mastermind/dominant” author doctrine with the run of cases discussing ownership of software outputs (i.e., Copyright Office (the Office) when it comes to copyright ownership of artificial intelligence (AI) output. The Office has answered that question with a resounding “maybe.” Walt Disney Co. ,

article thumbnail

8th Circ. Won't Revive Heart Valve Contract Dispute

IP Law 360

The Eighth Circuit has backed a lower court's decision to toss a contract breach suit against medical device manufacturer LivaNova over the development of a heart valve therapy, arguing that the device maker was not obligated to keep the project going after LivaNova took ownership of the project in a 2017 acquisition.

article thumbnail

An Analysis of the Status Quo of FDI And Its Regulatory Framework In India Through the RBI’s FED Master Direction No.11/2017-18 On Foreign Investment

IP and Legal Filings

11/2017-18 on Foreign Investment. 11/2017-18 On Foreign Investment first appeared on IPLF. In order to execute the rules set forth, this Master Direction specifies the procedures that Authorized Persons must follow when conducting foreign exchange operations with their clients or constituents. PROHIBITED SECTOR AND PERSONS.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 22: TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel CHENOA FUND Registration for Mortgage Services Due to Non-Ownership

The TTABlog

In deciding the issue of ownership, the Board was guided by Lyons v. An application filed by one who is not the owner of the mark is a "void application." of Veterinary Sports Med. & Rehab. 3d 1023, 123 USPQ2d 1024, 1028 (Fed.