CopyrightsWorld

APRIL 29, 2022

The US Copyright Office has determined that some AI artworks cannot be copyrighted in the United States. Last Monday, the Copyright Office issued a fresh ruling rejecting a request to copyright an AI-generated artwork. “Visions of a Dying Brain” created by AI. says the author.

Copyright 98

Copyright Artwork Public Domain Copyright Law 98

IPilogue

MARCH 18, 2022

Provisions for copyright ownership by the Crown are a consistent feature of copyright laws in commonwealth countries. These provisions have been used to retain Crown ownership over literary, artistic, or otherwise creative expressions. The Flag is declared an official flag of Australia under section 5 of Australia’s Flags Act, 1953.

Government 120

Government Copyright Ownership Copyright Law 120

The IP Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M. This result is not surprising because it is consistent with prior results.

Art 120

Art Copyright Registration Fair Use 120

IPilogue

OCTOBER 7, 2022

In November of 2018, a limited-edition Enchanted Owl print sold for almost ten times that price, totaling at Waddington’s Auctioneers and Appraisals Toronto – breaking the record for the most expensive Canadian artist print ever sold via auction. Not all Canadian galleries oppose ARRs.

Art 105

Art Moral Rights Artwork Editing 105

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 17, 2022

Secondly, the doctrine is about ownership, not existence of a valid copyright. AI-generated Kats The Review also rejected Thaler’s argument that AI can be an author under copyright law because the work made for hire doctrine allows for “non-human, artificial persons such as companies” to be authors.

Copyright 145

Copyright Artistic Work Copyright Law Contracts 145

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 10, 2023

13, 2018) Come to think of it you, you may also recall a California case holding VARA did not apply to graffiti comprised of large scale murals on the exterior of San Francisco’s oldest continuously operating queer bar, The Stud. However, in 5Pointz the building owner consented to the artwork installation. G&M Realty L.P.

Social Media 52

Social Media Art Fair Use Moral Rights 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M.

Art 52

Art Copyright Registration Fair Use 52

The IPKat

DECEMBER 14, 2023

The Regulations also protect the rights of authors of an original applied or fine artwork to a share in the proceeds of sale of that work as long as copyright subsists. A presentation of the report was made by Hon. This accusation comes two years after the EFCC launched its online application for reporting crime, called the "Eagle Eye".

Copyright 92

Copyright IP Social Media Copyright Infringement 92

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 30, 2022

Remember the Fifth Circuit case from 2018 holding that a real restaurant’s name could infringe trademark rights in the name of a fictional restaurant from the TV show SpongeBob SquarePants, the Krusty Krab? It confirms both ownership of valid copyrights and copying by the defendants of original constituent elements of the works.

Blogging 91

Blogging Social Media Television Fair Use 91

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 7, 2022

Within hours, his work, Comedian , sold for $120,000, went viral, and became that year’s perhaps most discussed artwork. [2] Morford cannot claim ownership over a natural element (a fruit) and a functional component (duct tape). 2018); Norris Indus., 3] On July 6, 2022, Judge Robert N. ” [21]. Sheen , 77 F.3d

Copyright 52

Copyright Copying Artwork Art 52

IPilogue

MARCH 1, 2022

Not asking someone if you can share their comic about depression before reposting it to your tens or hundreds of thousands of followers is irresponsible and can read as disrespectful of the time the illustrator put into the original artwork.” ” E: What has your experience been like collaborating with other makers?

Social Media 106

Social Media IP Business Branding 106

IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

NFTs are an attempt to enforce decentralization, ownership tracking, and value storage, while also making the lawful owner’s claim to the original work visible in the event of duplication. It aims to act as valid proof of ownership and grants the creator “digital bragging rights” through traceable proof of ownership.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Ownership Contracts Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 1, 2022

As many know by now, non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) are unique units of data stored on a blockchain that have become an increasingly popular way to buy and sell artwork (as well as all kinds of other things). 16, 2018), available at: [link]. [3]. Code § 77b(a)(1). [7]. See 15 U.S. Code § 77b(a)(1). [8]. 8]. See, e.g. , Uselton v.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Law Contracts Artwork 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made. Thus, Warhol possessed rights over the creative contributions he made, but so did Goldsmith, as her creation served as the foundation for the final artwork.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52