Remove 2022 Remove Advertising Remove Contracts Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Africa IP highlights 2022 #1: Copyright matters

The IPKat

This Africa IP Highlights 2022 is the result of collaboration between myself and Doreen Adoma Agyei and Clarisse Mideva. Amongst other things, the Act also establishes a National Rights Registry (NRR ) , which is the central repository collating details pertaining to the ownership of various copyright works.

Copyright 120
article thumbnail

It’s Not Going to Be (Y)easy: What Happens when Business Collaborations Dissolve?

IPilogue

On October 25, 2022, following a string of antisemitic remarks and hate speech from Ye (formerly known as Kanye West) on social media, Adidas announced their decision to terminate their co-branding partnership with Ye and end production of all Yeezy branded products. While Ye’s company, Mascotte Holdings Inc.

Business 131
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 22: TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel CHENOA FUND Registration for Mortgage Services Due to Non-Ownership

The TTABlog

92076723 (August 15, 2022) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. TMRR conceived of a mortgage financing program that would be run by a Native American Tribe, and it contracted with the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah (CBC) to implement and operate the program. In deciding the issue of ownership, the Board was guided by Lyons v.

article thumbnail

Ten things to know about NFTs

The IPKat

Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. There have also been complaints where creators have tried to NFT their own creativity but by doing so have breached a contract. The terms of ownership and remuneration vary between platforms.

article thumbnail

failure to properly allege falsity dooms FedEx at 6th Circuit

43(B)log

2024) The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of FedEx’s false advertising claims (under the Lanham Act and Tennessee Consumer Protection Act), albeit on somewhat different grounds. Collectively they’re called “contracted service providers” (CSPs). Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. Route Consultant, Inc., 23-5456, F.4th

article thumbnail

crypto lender plausibly violated UCL via unlawfulness and deceptiveness

43(B)log

2022 WL 3590329, No. 22, 2022) Nexo’s Crypto Credit service allows users to take out loans against cryptocurrency collateral. The false advertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., Clients retain 100% ownership of their digital assets.

article thumbnail

literal falsity of claim that website doesn't allow checkout in under a minute supports preliminary injunction

43(B)log

DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal false advertising law. Challenged claim: DealMaker’s customers do not retain ownership over their own data. Defendants offered examples of contracts that, they argued, had a fee structure of 8-10%.