Remove 2023 Remove Advertising Remove Branding Remove Brands
article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

Lei, 2023 WL 6373073, No. 21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. In December 2020, Deetsch notified Amazon of his patents through the Brand Registry portal and asked Amazon to remove the Lei defendants’ products. 22-cv-1166-RSH-BLM (S.D.

article thumbnail

Stay ADvised: Brand Protection & Advertising Law News - August 2023 - 2

JD Supra Law

In each photograph, a blonde woman stands in a Barbie-pink gym beside lifting equipment and a pack of pink-branded energy drinks. By: Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

New Guidance on the Subject of Comparative Advertising and Dilution of Goodwill

JD Supra Law

In 2023, the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Canada Inc. Gillette Company (2023 FC 804). The decision clarifies some of the laws applicable to comparative advertising in this country and should guide the conduct of parties that engage in this form of commercial activity.

article thumbnail

Recap: 2023 ANA Annual Advertising and Marketing Law Conference

JD Supra Law

The weekend has just closed on another very rainy Floridian ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference (Last year we had a hurricane, so this would qualify as an uninspiring upgrade).

article thumbnail

Federal Court’s decision in Energizer Brands, LLC v Gillette Company narrows test for depreciation of goodwill in comparative advertising cases

JD Supra Law

Last week, the Federal Court of Canada issued its long-awaited decision in Energizer Brands, LLC v Gillette Company, 2023 FC 804. The case is noteworthy because it is a “comparative advertising” case, and one of only a few that have dissected section 22 of the Trademarks Act. By: Smart & Biggar

article thumbnail

Upholding Quality and Protecting Brands: Tempur Sealy v. Luxury Mattress & Furniture

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

In the competitive world of mattresses and bedding, brand recognition and trust are paramount. recently filed a lawsuit against Defendant Luxury Mattress & Furniture LLC , a suit highlighting the significance of safeguarding trademarks and brand integrity. Plaintiff Tempur Sealy International Inc. Continue reading

article thumbnail

Canadian Trademark Law 2023: A Year in Review

JD Supra Law

2023 was an active year in Canadian trademark law. Canadian Courts addressed a wide range of issues, from licensing to comparative advertising to co-branding. Notable changes also emerged from the Canadian Trademarks Office. Additionally, many trademark fees increased by 20-35%.