article thumbnail

“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed

Intellectual Property Law Blog

15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. Design Patent No. gloves) have a wavy pattern with the “Seirus” logo throughout the design. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.

Art 162
article thumbnail

5 Spooky Articles About Copyright and Halloween

Plagiarism Today

If you want a more complete list of the Halloween-related articles that have been featured on this site, check out this post from October 2021. However, if you want more of a highlight reel, this article should help get you started. The post 5 Spooky Articles About Copyright and Halloween appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

Copyright 263
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Chilly Adventures: Design Patent Prior Art Comparison Applies to Article of Manufacture

JD Supra Law

Addressing a matter of first impression concerning the scope of prior art relevant to a design patent infringement analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “to qualify as comparison prior art, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.”

article thumbnail

USPTO Publishes Final Rule Establishing Separate Design Patent Bar

IP Watchdog

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced that a final rule will be published tomorrow, November 16, in the Federal Register implementing a design patent practitioner bar. The Office first published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to the Federal Register in May 2023 contemplating a separate design patent practitioner bar.

article thumbnail

EUIPO on trade marks and designs in the metaverse

The IPKat

The Office underlined that the 2023 draft Guidelines (see here ) will set out such a practical approach (see here the draft of Trade Marks Guidelines , section “6.25 Challenges involving designs in the metaverse were also addressed. It was indicated that usage in the metaverse might constitute use in accordance with Article 19 CDR.

Designs 144
article thumbnail

“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed

JD Supra Law

15, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. 2021-2299, 2021-2338 (Fed.

Art 64
article thumbnail

Seeking Clarity on Comparison Prior Art: Seirus Petitions Supreme Court in Heat Wave Design Patent Dispute

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running design patent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Questions presented: When looking for comparison prior art, is the article’s function relevant in any way? Must the comparison prior art be the “same article” as claimed? 511 (1871).