article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

2024 WL 629985, No. 30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. Lashify, Inc. Qingdao Lashbeauty Cosmetic Co.,

article thumbnail

Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is actionable

43(B)log

Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No. 23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. came in the midst of other advertising language, such as “Various colors available,” and “no RED TAPE. State of N.Y. It was not.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

CFP: Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2024

43(B)log

The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, false advertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. The Roundtable will be held on Friday, October 18, 2024. Submissions must be of full drafts in Microsoft word format.

article thumbnail

misrepresentation to Amazon isn't "commercial advertising or promotion"

43(B)log

Wong, 2024 WL 553695, NO. 12, 2024) This default judgment actually analyzes the false advertising claims, which is why I note it. This wasn’t commercial advertising or promotion. Amazon.com, Inc. C19-0990JLR (W.D. Obviously, the trademark-related claims succeeded.

article thumbnail

small competitor lacks standing against big one's nondisparaging advertising

43(B)log

3d -, 2024 WL 940089 (N.D. 5, 2024) Sometimes, courts are very generous to competitors in presuming Lanham Act standing—as with the recent Meta ruling —and sometimes they aren’t. Shkipin’s amended false advertising counterclaim fails again. Shkipin, F.Supp.3d Previous ruling.

article thumbnail

ex-employee's Glassdoor post wasn't commercial advertising or promotion

43(B)log

Ferens, 2024 WL 710632, No. 21, 2024) ECRI and its CEO sued Ferens, a former ECRI employee, for various things including defamation, IIED, violations of trade secret law, and Lanham Act false advertising. The Glassdoor review was not “commercial advertising or promotion.” Schabacker v. 22-3778 (E.D.

article thumbnail

What’s Trending in Trademarks, March 2024: Chanel Reseller Found Liable for Trademark Infringement, False Advertising; Federal Circuit Rejects TTAB’s Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

JD Supra Law

Every month, Erise’s trademark attorneys review the latest developments at the U.S.