article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. W-22-CV-00776-ADA-DTG, No. W-22-CV-00777-ADA-DTG (W.D. 1, 2017 to Apr.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat False Advertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v. Amazon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court says that Amazon “easily satisfies” this factor: Plaintiff’s claims are all based on the theory that Defendants ‘continue to allow unlawful sellers to maintain their accounts’ and ‘permit them to advertise’ on Defendants’ website. This argument has failed so many times. Google opinion.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. As the court says later, “it seems unlikely that an Internet user who reads defendant’s advertisements would believe that they belong to or are endorsed by plaintiffs.”

article thumbnail

no disgorgement under state law when false advertising wasn't shown to result in sales

43(B)log

Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. Republic alleged that HBI, its competitor in the tobacco rolling paper industry, engaged in false advertising under the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and violations of the IUDTPA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, 2023 WL 3004625, No. 16 C 03401 (N.D. 19, 2023) Previous discussion.

article thumbnail

National Ass'n of Realtors fails to show standing in false advertising counterclaim

43(B)log

22, 2022) Part of a larger dispute; the National Association of Realtors (NAR) counterclaimed against REX for false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act. However, NAR didn’t allege that any consumers or brokers have withheld trade from NAR as a result of the advertisements. Zillow, Inc., 2022 WL 1203742, No.

article thumbnail

9th Circuit finds noncompetitor lacks statutory standing in nondisparagement false advertising case

43(B)log

2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s false advertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. It sells compounds/licenses its technology for use in sports nutrition supplements, while BPI produces its own dietary supplements.

article thumbnail

Former distributor's continuing use of "authorized distributor" leads to TM and false advertising claims

43(B)log

but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and false advertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. Still, that’s limited to using the trademark on a resold article and its immediate packaging, but not using stylized marks and logos on advertising materials.