Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fair use opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. Andy Warhol Foundation v.

Fair Use 92

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 92

IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith, Andy Warhol not only used Ms. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2022

“Warhol Print” (Vanity Fair), Page 8, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. “Goldsmith Photograph”, Page 7, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Starkly deviating from this trend was a Second Circuit panel decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 128

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 128

JD Supra Law

JUNE 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s recent and much-anticipated decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith redefines the contours of the fair use defense to copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Licensing 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 22, 2023

Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the respondent copyright holder in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Lynn Goldsmith et al., By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Art Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. 2] A week later, the U.S. 3] Graham v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Vanity Fair , in turn, commissioned Warhol to make a silkscreen using Goldsmith’s photograph. Originals” [7] : The Works at Issue.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

TorrentFreak

AUGUST 20, 2022

The UFC’s reputation as the world’s leading mixed martial arts promotion is the result of almost three decades of hard work and unwavering dedication to combat sports. Whatever happens, the UFC can put any fighter in a videogame 5,000 years from now and still have permission to use their likeness, complete with licensed tattoos.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Copyright Licensing Intellectual Property 105

JD Supra Law

JANUARY 17, 2024

It has been eight months since the Supreme Court’s landmark copyright fair use decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Art, Inc. Much has been written on the subject, including in this forum, but in many ways it was a narrow decision. By: Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Art 67

Art Fair Use Licensing Business 67

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2023

A Few Words for a Lost Friend: Tribute to Dmitry Karshtedt (Bob Brauneis, Mark Lemley, Jake Sherkow) Closing Plenary Session: Fair use Robert Brauneis, Copyright Transactions in the Shadow of Fair Use Suppose a work does not infringe another work because and only because it’s been ruled a fair use.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Marketing 59

JD Supra Law

MAY 25, 2023

Last week, the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited copyright fair use decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith et al.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Law Art Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

IP Watchdog

MAY 18, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was correct in holding that the Andy Warhol Foundation's (AWF's) licensing of an orange silkscreen portrait of the musician Prince, created by Andy Warhol using photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s photo, was not fair. The Supreme Court ruled today in Andy Warhol Foundation v. that the U.S.

Fair Use 124

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 124

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 30, 2021

Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).

Fair Use 103

Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Law 103

JD Supra Law

JUNE 1, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s s (AWF), in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fair use. At issue before the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. copyright law. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Law Art 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 24, 2023

The justices' 7-2 decision addresses fair use, "transformative" artistic changes, and a 1981 photo of Prince - On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its hotly anticipated decision exploring the elusive boundaries of fair use in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith, No.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Licensing 52

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

Introduction: The creative AI and the art generated by such algorithms and technology are raising questions in field of copyright law which have emerged recently. AI is becoming more and more advanced by the day resulting in creation of such art without any sort of skills or human intervention required. [3]

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

43(B)log

MAY 2, 2023

19, 2022) Technically, the trademark analysis here is weird (the parties agreed that the copyright fair use analysis would determine the trademark fair use analysis; the plaintiff’s lawyer is Higbee, FWIW), but the trademark claim is so clearly Dastar -barred and parasitic on the copyright claims that it’s hard to object.

Art 59

Art Fair Use Marketing Marketing 59

JIPEL Copyright Blog

APRIL 11, 2022

In the past few years, the Second Circuit in particular has had the difficult task of reconciling copyright law with appropriation art, an artistic style predicated on the intentional use of preexisting images and objects. for the Visual Arts, Inc. Andy Warhol Found. Goldsmith, No. 19-2420-cv, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 25277 (2d Cir.

Art 52

Art Copyright Law Fair Use Copyright 52

JD Supra Law

JUNE 16, 2023

In a highly anticipated ruling, the Supreme Court found that the Andy Warhol Foundation (“AWF”)’s licensing of “Orange Prince” to Condé Nast was not “fair use” of a Lynn Goldsmith photograph that served as the basis for Andy Warhol’s Prince Series. By: Irwin IP LLP

Art 52

Art Fair Use Licensing IP 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. The first factor of fair use considers the nature of and reasons for a copier’s use of an original work. [4]

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

Art Law Journal

JULY 31, 2020

Knowing more about copyright and fair use will help you determine what is yours to use and what is off limits. Nicole Martinez.

Fair Use 73

Fair Use Blogging Copyright Social Media 73

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 27, 2021

The Doctrine of Fair Use is a concept that originates from the case of Folsom vs. Marsh. Justice Story observed in his judgement, when the courts of law decide on cases like this, they must look to the nature and objects of the selection mode, the quantity and value of material used. Percentage of Original Material Used.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Law 52

Plagiarism Today

OCTOBER 11, 2022

1: Justices to Consider Whether Warhol Image is “Fair Use” of Photograph of Prince. First off today, Ronald Mann at SCOTUSblog reports that, tomorrow, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is expected to hear arguments in the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 178

Fair Use Reporting Licensing Plagiarism 178

LexBlog IP

APRIL 18, 2022

Supreme Court recently granted a petition for writ of certiorari (docket, here ) to review the extent to which a work of art is a “transformative” fair use under the Copyright Act. Vanity Fair licensed one of Goldsmith’s Prince photographs to use in a Vanity Fair article.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Copyright Art Copyright Law 40

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. The Warhol Estate appealed, but only on the first fair use factor. Damle introductory statement, Tr. 1258, (2023).

Fair Use 106

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 106

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 13, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. was entitled to a declaration that Warhol’s “Prince Series” did not infringe Goldsmith’s photo.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 12, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. was entitled to a declaration that Warhol’s “Prince Series” did not infringe Goldsmith’s photo.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

JD Supra Law

JULY 7, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision that the licensing of an image Andy Warhol created of musician Prince (titled “Orange Prince”) based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith for use as a magazine cover was not fair use. In the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing 52

IP Tech Blog

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fair use. In finding in defendant’s favor, the Court weighed the different factors of the Fair Use Doctrine. Further, when the tattoo is shown, it appears as one fraction of an 8-way split screen montage comprised of other fan art. Koons , 467 F.3d

Fair Use 62

Fair Use Cease and Desist Social Media Art 62

Velocity of Content

AUGUST 9, 2022

I knew a bare minimum about him, but my trip to the museum immersed me in a whole world of Warhol that included a panoply of works from installation art to his more iconic pieces. My perspective on Warhol changed, with the visit helping me understand just a bit more about how much ground Warhol’s art covered. .

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Art 98

JD Supra Law

JULY 13, 2023

In May, the Supreme Court issued an unusually contentious 7-2 decision concerning the fair use defense available to alleged copyright infringers. The majority decision in The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement Art 52

IPilogue

DECEMBER 13, 2022

At last, the Supreme Court of the United States can have its say on the protectability of the subjects of ‘pop art’. In 1984, Vanity Fair magazine received a licence from photographer Lynn Goldsmith to use her 1981 portrait of Prince, which she had shot on assignment for Newsweek.

Art 79

Art Fair Use Intellectual Property Licensing 79

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 2, 2023

Getty Images generates revenue by licensing the right to use its assets to businesses and consumers. Getty Images claims that its assets are highly desirable for use in connection with AI and machine learning, and it has licensed millions of digital assets to technology innovators for various purposes.

Copyright Infringement 104

Copyright Infringement Copyright Fair Use Technology 104

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

The series was originally commissioned by Vanity Fair after it bought the license of the photo portrait from Goldsmith. The legal question at the center of the dispute is whether Warhol’s series is fair use of Goldsmith’s original photograph. The trial judge John G.

Copyright Infringement 105

Copyright Infringement Copyright Art Fair Use 105

IPilogue

OCTOBER 1, 2022

Fischer found triable issues on substantial similarity and fair use. Kat Von D did not request authorization or a license to reproduce the image. To freehand ink the tattoo, Kat Von D created a stencil by using a light box to trace the Davis photograph. Background. For example, in Alexander v. Lynn Goldsmith, et al.

Copyright Infringement 130

Copyright Infringement Fair Use Art Copyright 130