Remove Brands Remove Designs Remove Editing Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Book Review: Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights (Second Edition)

The IPKat

This Kat is pleased to review the ā€œ Overlapping Intellectual Property rights ā€, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). The volume is a beautiful testimony to the work of late Shamnad Basheer, who co-edited the first edition.

article thumbnail

Announcing the 2023 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Iā€™m pleased to announce the 2023 edition (14th edition) of my Internet Law casebook, Internet Law: Cases & Materials. Meanwhile, product design is the real Section 230 battlefront today, and the Lemmon case is the flagship case for that line of litigation. Jurisdiction Evaluating Personal Jurisdiction Herbal Brands v.

Editing 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Are you Smarter than a Law Student? (Civil Procedure Edition)

Patently-O

The company also owns a design patent covering the product. Later, during litigation, Dryson submitted a request to Amaxon seeking discovery of documents held by Amaxon that relate to Drysonā€™s intellectual property. Russell Brand is one of the people injured. Brand is a famous and wealthy comedian. – Dennis.

Editing 71
article thumbnail

Monday Miscellany

The IPKat

Find out by reviewing the latest edition of our miscellany post. There will also be workshops on artificial intelligence, trade secrets, co-branding, copyright in IP enforcement and amicus curiae briefs (as well as a whole range of other topics!). And, for events, do not forget to regularly check our Events page.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Postsā€“Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. Internet Brands , 230 applies to the failure-to-warn claims because “Plaintiffsā€™ theory would require the editing of third-party content, thus treating Defendants as a publisher of content.”

article thumbnail

Fish & Richardson Elevates 17 Attorneys to PrincipalĀ 

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. Will Freeman focuses his practice on patent litigation in U.S. He received his J.D.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 13- May 19)Ā 

SpicyIP

We are thrilled to announce the judges for this edition: Prof. (Dr.) SpicyIP Tidbit: Delhi High Court grants an Ex-parte Ad interim Injunction to Designer Gaurav Gupta On DHC’s recent interim injunction to designer Gaurav Gupta, Surabhi highlights the problem with the Court’s one glove fits all approach in this tidbit.