companies match-group-llc 
TorrentFreak
OCTOBER 22, 2023
It’s a trend currently mirrored in reports filed by other rightsholder groups. In summary, IBCAP’s takedown notices are ignored, AAPA’s are ignored, and the Premier League – which identified 77,000 illegal match streams in 2022/23 and sent a corresponding number of takedown notices – receives identical treatment.
43(B)log
AUGUST 27, 2021
Collection Development, LLC v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC, No. timeshare exit company case, the judge recommended tossing the exit company’s unclean hands defense. The timeshare company’s allegedly inequitable conduct was harmed a third party, not the exit company. Diamond Resorts U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TorrentFreak
JANUARY 24, 2022
When copyright holders observe an IP address sharing unauthorized content in a BitTorrent swarm, they need to match that IP address to a real-life name and physical address if they want to take things any further. Movie Companies Present Their Reasoning. A Tangled Web of the Same Companies & People. What Happens Next?
The IPKat
JUNE 23, 2022
No time to rebrand as 21 week delay to injunction refused Combe International LLC v Dr August Wolff GmbH [2022] EWHC 125 (Ch) (January 2022) We covered the hoo-ha between VAGISIL and VAGISAN in the last volume. Match Group owned UK and EUTMs for MATCH.COM (the earliest filed in 1996) and a figurative MATCH mark, but no word mark for MATCH.
TorrentFreak
DECEMBER 6, 2021
Nevertheless, some of the most powerful entertainment companies in the world are continuously on the prowl, looking for operations of wider importance and/or representing lower-hanging fruit. At least in part, this may be a calculation based on the likelihood of being targeted, let alone identified and held to account.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
Industrial Cleaning Equipment v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment [2023] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2023) The case title might suggest this is a battle between two highly descriptive marks (ala Office Cleaning), but in fact both of these floor cleaning equipment companies had adopted the abbreviation ICE. IPKat here and here.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JUNE 15, 2022
A stipulation as restrictive as Sotera’s “ensures that an inter partes review is a ‘true alternative’ to the district court proceeding” 9 by matching the 35 U.S.C.A. § For example, in Ocado Group PLC v. Reynolds Vapor Company v. 19 Sand Revolution II, LLC v. Trucking LLC , IPR2019-01393, Paper 24 at 11-12 (June 16, 2020).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
93 
Let's personalize your content