Remove companies twitter-inc articles
article thumbnail

Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena on First Amendment Grounds–In re 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This case involves a pseudonymous Twitter account, “@ CallMeMoneyBags.” Soon after, an entity called Bayside asserted copyright ownership of the photos and sent 512(c)(3) takedown notices to Twitter followed by a 512(h) subpoena to unmask CallMeMoneyBags. Twitter sought to quash the subpoena. The supervising judge overturns it.

article thumbnail

Muddy Waters Ahead for Clearview AI

IPilogue

Facial recognition software company Clearview AI, Inc. In February 2021, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (“the Commissioner”) released a report on Clearview AI, Inc. concluding the company engaged in the unlawful collection, use, and disclosure of personal information through its facial recognition software.

Privacy 106
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IPR And Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code

IP and Legal Filings

The financial distress of the company can lead to the insolvency and could affect the management. As the companies are dependent on intellectual property rights there must be a person who is an expert in the matter of intellectual property rights. In the case of Revlon Inc.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (June 28 – July 4)

SpicyIP

Volvo, to argue that there has been a trend in these cases wherein giant companies go after smaller companies and start-ups with a collection of baseless arguments, in a bid to broaden the scope of their brand and cash in on the consequential benefits that flow from the same. In light of Twitter blocking IT Minister R.S.

article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex:Product disparagement or nominative fair use?

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction Advertising is an important strategy for a company to sell its products to the customer. To increase their sales, often companies indulge themselves in comparative advertising. The Delhi High Court in the case of Colgate Palmolive Company and Ors vs Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt. [i] Dabur India Ltd.

article thumbnail

1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 4 (Advertising, Contracts, & More)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

22, 2021): companies now pay so-called “influencers” to issue posts on social media touting their products or services. Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood used Ice Cube’s picture and paraphrase of a line from his song to illustrate an article about market corrections. DoorDash, Inc., Express Lien, Inc.

article thumbnail

Web Scraping for Me, But Not for Thee (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Some of the biggest companies on earth—including Meta and Microsoft—take aggressive, litigious approaches to prohibiting web scraping on their own properties, while taking liberal approaches to scraping data on other companies’ properties. The social media companies have no cognizable property right to assert in this content/data.