article thumbnail

AI as Author: Thaler v. Perlmutter Now Before the DC Circuit

Patently-O

Stephen Thaler’s attempts to register a copyright for an artistic image autonomously generated by his AI system that he has named the “Creativity Machine.” Copyright Office refused registration on the basis that the work lacked the required human authorship. ” The U.S. Thaler appealed to the D.C.

article thumbnail

Is Machine-Made Art Copyrightable?

The IP Law Blog

The work was created by a machine called “Creativity Machine” and was submitted for copyright registration in 2018 by Steven Thaler. In his copyright application, Mr. Thaler stated that he was the owner of the Creativity Machine and that the machine had autonomously created the work of art using an algorithm.

Art 97
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2021 IP Year in Review

IPilogue

This article summarizes the top developments reported on our blog and in patents, trademarks, and copyright law in 2021. Continued Debates over AI as an Inventor. Around the world, patent registrars grappled with patent applications that credit artificial intelligence software as the inventor. Trademark Law.

IP 106
article thumbnail

Sunday Surprises

The IPKat

More information and registration details are available here. GIs Workshop The Institute for Information Law at the University of Amsterdam is organising a seminar on the new legislation on geographical indications (GIs). More information, including registration details and the programme can be found here.

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and creativity in visual art: what are the protectability requirements? Part 2: the US Thaler vs Perlmutter case

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In his application, he identified the author as the Creativity Machine, and explained the work had been “ autonomously created by a computer algorithm running on a machine ”, but Thaler sought to claim the copyright of the “ computer-generated work ” himself “ as a work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity Machine. ” 102(a) ; U.S.

Art 65
article thumbnail

Is Machine-Made Art Copyrightable?

LexBlog IP

” The work was created by a machine called “Creativity Machine” and was submitted for copyright registration in 2018 by Steven Thaler. In his copyright application, Mr. Thaler stated that he was the owner of the Creativity Machine and that the machine had autonomously created the work of art using an algorithm.

Art 52
article thumbnail

AI and copyright in 2022

Kluwer Copyright Blog

We will keep the law under review and could amend, replace or remove protection in future if the evidence supports it.” Registration was refused in August 2019, in line with previous US case law and guidance. The team has appealed the decision , so watch this space.)

Copyright 145