IPilogue

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Therefore, the purchaser of an NFT will only receive the underlying copyright when the smart contract accompanying the NFT expresses this. Of course, unless waived by the artist, the moral rights associated with the artistic work remain with the artist. What about copyright infringement? Old Laws Protect New Trends.

Non-Fungible Tokens 111

Non-Fungible Tokens Art Moral Rights Copyright Infringement 111

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2023

Regardless, as of this writing there are now five cases that may provide some clarity on this less frequently discussed but foundational issue of the unauthorized use of copyrighted materials as training data for AI (I use “AI” here as a shorthand which also includes text and data mining and machine learning). Case 1- Doe 1 v.

Litigation 98

Litigation Fair Use Copying Derivative Work 98

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 26, 2023

According to Section 2(d)(v) of the Copyright Act, the producer of a cinematograph film is considered the work’s creator. [1] This preference for producers in copyright law has recently been questioned. REFERENCES [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [1] [link] [2] Supra note 4 at s.

Copyright 52

Copyright Music Moral Rights Ownership 52

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2022

Producers may claim exclusive ownership of an album or song in court owing to copyright protections. Rights to distribute and reproduce the work exclusively, as well as the right to grant a license that will allow the copyright holder to collect royalties, are included in this property.

Music 79

Music Copyright Copyright Infringement Moral Rights 79

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 20, 2023

Spadika Jayaraj discussed a case where the Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a media house accusing copyright infringement on its database of users. The issue has often arisen in the context of protecting confidential information through copyright law. E.g., see Prateek Surisetti’s post here and Niyati Prabhu’s post here.

Personality Rights 59

Personality Rights IP Licensing Copyright 59

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Topics include access and substantial similarity, fair use, performers’ rights, moral rights, expert testimony, the role of lay listeners, sound sampling, as demonstrated in dispositions of litigated and settled infringement disputes.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Registration Editing 67

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

The equivalent provision to the above, Section 11 of the old Copyright Act, provides: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, copyright shall be transmissible by assignment, by testamentary disposition or by operation of law, as movable property. copyright), can one call such a constitutional right?

Copyright 62

Copyright Moral Rights Government Public Domain 62

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

ii] Existing copyright law is ineffective in its application to new forms of digital media. xviii] In one instance, Getty Images pursued a German blog—Geek Sisters—for almost $900 in licensing fees for their use of the awkward penguin meme.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 11, 2022

When it comes to dealing with Personality Rights it is very important to determine who will and who will not be covered under this regime, as previously stated the benefit of the particular rights can only be granted in the case of an Actual influential personality.

Personality Rights 52

Personality Rights Artistic Work Trademark Copyright 52

The IPKat

MAY 22, 2023

Njoku-Goodwin also adds that this process reduces the creative output to mere data and numbers rather than it being treated as a creation by a human which in turn undermines the benefit of having copyright in the first place.

Music 82

Music Intellectual Property Copyright Technology 82

The IPKat

JANUARY 24, 2023

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following legislative update on the new Ukrainian Copyright Law from Kateryna Militsyna and Liubov Maidanyk (both Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv). It also once again confirms the strong protection of moral rights in Ukrainian copyright law.

Related Rights 145

Related Rights Law Copyright Moral Rights 145

SpicyIP

MAY 1, 2023

Licensing of training datasets The licensing of datasets – for the concerned rights under Sec. 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (the Act), along with attribution seems like a possible solution that would address the concerns raised in the above cases. Her previous posts on the blog can be viewed here , here , here , here.

IP 129

IP Licensing Fair Use Moral Rights 129

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 22, 2024

Development of Copyright Law Protection of Intellectual property rights has always been in existence among various sections of the society. TRIPS Agreement accepted the Berne Convention except Article which states that copyright protected work shall enjoy the copyright protection in all countries of the union.

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Fair Use Intellectual Property 52

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 10, 2022

The statute of limitations for copyright infringement in Singapore is six years. Copyright protects works like literary, computer programs, plays, music and paintings. It is not ideas but their expression that are protected by copyright law. It can be licensed or transferred, either as an entire bundle (i.e.,

Copyright 75

Copyright Intellectual Property Registration Copyright Infringement 75

Kluwer Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. Claims under copyright law.

Contracts 98

Contracts Copyright Law Cease and Desist 98

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. Microsoft Technology Licensing v. The Microsoft Technology Licensing judgement was passed by a Single Judge Bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula. the licensee.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124