article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

Each of these cases is unique, fact dependent, and likely, if fully litigated on the merits, to shed light on different aspects of copyright law. The post Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions appeared first on Copyright Clearance Center. is being used as code. Ltd, et al.-

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium: Amy Adler Keynote and Warhol panel

43(B)log

Conceptual work is beneath the surface of the work. Fair use is not just a game for rich artists like Koons and Warhol, though they’re the reported cases; most artists can’t afford high-stakes litigation. Court’s assumption that there is an objective meaning of a work. If no, then coffee is in a market of its own.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US Copyright class action against OpenAI

Kluwer Copyright Blog

It imposes legislative obligations at all stages of the lifecycle of an AI system, from: training, testing and validation; to conformity assessments; risk management systems; and post-market monitoring. Despite the various regulatory approaches, litigation is starting to emerge due to the inherent uncertainty of the topic.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Holds Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Not Transformative, Not Fair Use

IP Tech Blog

What is or is not “transformative,” however, is largely framed by the original author’s statutory right to control derivative works, i.e., a new work of authorship that is created by modifying, transforming or adapting the original in some way. At this point, this speculation seems a little premature.

article thumbnail

WIPIP: In Memoriam and Fair Use

43(B)log

Fair uses tend to divide into buckets: justified by new work; justified by project. New work: Derivative work or embedding work: Cambpell v. Use is justified by context of being placed in new work. Not suggesting that “work” and “project” are exhaustive categories. Prince is work plus embodiment.

article thumbnail

HIT NETFLIX CONTENT AND THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT THAT FOLLOWS

JIPL Online

Then, the post will predict how Netflix may shift its content practices, defense strategies, and settlement tactics as a result of their past litigation successes in copyright actions. Mora, Netflix Will See More Copyright Litigation After Eleventh Circuit Ruling , Daily Business Review (Oct. SETTLEMENT CASES. 1] See Michael A.