article thumbnail

Moderna sues Pfizer for mRNA Patent Infringement: when optics and profits reveal real issues in modern IP law usage

IPilogue

Moderna and Pfizer battleā€™s over the inventive process of their respective mRNA COVID-19 vaccines revisit the negative associations of profit, monopolies, and optics in patent litigation. Moderna claimed that they had registered foundational mRNA patents between 2010 and 2016. This exposes some concerns about our patent laws.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law: November 2023

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. Realtime Data v. Fortinet, No.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Book Review: A Practitionerā€™s Guide to European Patent Law (with a discount code)

The IPKat

This Kat is delighted to review ā€œ A Practitionerā€™s Guide to European Patent Law: For National Practice and the Unified Patent Court ā€ (Hart Publishing, 2022, 664 pp.). The book consists of seventeen chapters, mainly on substantive law, but it also addresses certain procedural matters and questions of international private law.

article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

Although no petitions have been granted, the Supreme Court has requested amicus briefs from the Federal Government in four particular cases. But, the real boost only happens if the government brief supports certiorari. However, a statutory right is insufficient for Constitutional standing. 2022)(forthcoming).

article thumbnail

Parliamentary Standing Committee Report on IPR: Tipping the Scales of Patent Law? Part II

SpicyIP

The Report recommends that instead of completely abandoning patent applications for non-compliance with minor procedural/timeline requirements, penalties or fees should be imposed to induce some flexibility in the process. The Report recommends replacing the imprisonment term with a substantial monetary penalty for non-compliance.

Reporting 136
article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Directs Maharaja to Pay a Kingā€™s Ransom in a Patent Infringement SuitĀ Ā 

SpicyIP

Putting an end to a 24 year old patent infringement suit, the Delhi High Court has directed Maharaja Appliances Ltd. Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors, the court awarded actual costs in pursuing the suit for 15 years as well. [ This post has been co-authored with Swaraj Paul Barooah ].

article thumbnail

I was already like this before you got here: prior use as an exception to patent infringement

Garrigues Blog

In addition, a third partyā€™s use of an invention before its registration by another is also relevant to assess patent infringement. The right of prior use is set forth in article 63 of the current Patents Law of 2015, the wording of which is practically identical to that of article 54 of the earlier Patents Law of 1986.