SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

Adding another leaf to the FCM patent litigation saga, the Delhi High Court on September 19 refused to grant an interim injunction to Vifor considering the launch of the Biological E’s product in the market. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. Dharmendra Vora case, the 2015 Vifor (International) Ltd.

Patent Infringement 105

Patent Infringement Patent Marketing Marketing 105

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

involves an allegation of patent infringement over United States Patent No. Court documents state the patent at issue is for a “Vessel Rinsing Apparatus,” that was issued on August 15, 2023. Delta further cites Wenzhou’s use of Amazon to sell the accused products and encourage others to infringe the patent, as well.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent 52

Kashishipr

JUNE 3, 2021

Today, companies are increasingly placing a huge amount of enterprise value on Intellectual Property (IP). For purposes of the US tax law, IP can take many forms. As embodied in the Internal Revenue Code, IRS regulations, and case laws, IP includes patents, trademarks, copyright, trade secrets, know-how, and computer software.

Intellectual Property 98

Intellectual Property Ownership IP Licensing 98

JD Supra Law

JUNE 1, 2022

Patent Infringement Case- The pharmaceutical company Moderna finds itself in an intense a legal battle regarding its popular Covid vaccine. Plaintiffs Arbutus Biopharma and Genevant Sciences are attempting to hold Moderna accountable for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law

Intellectual Property Law 98

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Patent Infringement Law 98

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. 9,745,123 (“the ’123 patent”). 287(a) , Unverferth has affixed serial numbers to its products to identify the patents used in those products. . § Continue reading

Cease and Desist 97

Cease and Desist Patent Infringement Patent Patent Law 97

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 8, 2023

They are alleging patent infringement concerning U.S. The complaint states that the Plaintiff (OP) has designed and patented an innovative orthopedic plate system explicitly made for pediatric patients. . (“WishBone”). 8,777,998 , titled “Pediatric Long Bone Support or Fixation Plate.”

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Designs Design 52

JD Supra Law

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

The Utility of Patents and Infringement- Patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry is a very valuable tool used, not only to protect the property rights of a potential new drug, but also, to protect a potential revenue stream large enough to allow recovery of costs associated with the development of a drug.

Intellectual Property Law 52

Intellectual Property Law Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Patent 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 21, 2023

DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. According to the Complaint, DSI’s software includes numerous technological improvements that were captured in a family of patent applications. In 2022 the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Litigation Patent Patent Application 52

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 2, 2021

TSA’s Infringement: Even with processes as seemingly obvious as loading, conveying, and stacking security trays, entities such as The Transportation Security Administration are subject to U.S. Court of Federal Claims for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law

Intellectual Property Law 59

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Patent Patent Infringement 59

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

The significance of this case is that the Federal Circuit confirmed that parties can contractually negotiate away their right to file IPRs or other validity challenges in the Patent Office. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp.,

Patent Infringement 245

Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Contracts Confidentiality 245

LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2023

Nu Tsai Capital, LLC, [2023-1146] (February 17, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Lite-Netics patent-related speech, holding that the district court abused its discretion. Lite-Netics owns multiple patents on magnetic holiday string lights. Patent Nos.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 6, 2022

The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No. 10,864,933 (“933 Patent”) entitled “Four Position Hand Truck” to Harper on December 15, 2020. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Advertising Advertising 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 2, 2021

December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. Following the abrogation of Form 18, patent infringement claims must satisfy the plausibility standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp.

Patent Infringement 130

Patent Infringement Patent Technology Art 130

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

The Cost of Protecting Intellectual Property- A typical scenario for a patent infringement lawsuit may begin with some potential defendant selling a product. Next thing: you must defend against a patent infringement suit. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law

Cease and Desist 52

Cease and Desist Settlement Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 9, 2022

PUMA also alleges that the Brooks shoe the “Aurora BL” infringes upon their Design Patent No. D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Cease and Desist Trademark Design Patent 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

The significance of this case is that the Federal Circuit confirmed that parties can contractually negotiate away their right to file IPRs or other validity challenges in the Patent Office. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp.,

Patent Infringement 130

Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Contracts Confidentiality 130

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

NOVEMBER 24, 2023

According to the complaint, Davaus seeks legal affirmation that their product, the Kernel Keeper™ , does not infringe, is not covered by, and renders invalid the United States Patent No. ” S7 alleged that the Kernel Keeper™ infringed on their patent and demanded Davaus cease its production and sale.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent IP 52

IP Watchdog

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

A group of 25 experts in intellectual property law sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Jonathan Kanter today in support of a business review letter that the group said, “represented a legally sound and evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to innovative commercial institutions.”

Business 74

Business Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Licensing 74

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 1, 2024

9,361,658 , owned by Mantissa Corporation , the court addressed the issue of claim definiteness in the context of an infringement dispute with First Financial Corporation and First Financial Bank, N.A. The case focused on interpreting terms like “ transaction partner ” and “OFF” within the patent claims.

Patent 52

Patent Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Patent Infringement 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JUNE 25, 2021

Patent Nos. 7,860,448 and 7,412,203 (the “Patents in Suit”). The Patents in Suit relate to methods and computer programs for localizing broadcast content and an apparatus for operating a broadcast network, respectively. Westwood is seeking damages, including treble damages, for willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Ownership Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 8, 2023

for patent infringement. TeleBrands holds several patents related to the design and construction of expandable garden hoses, including US10174870 and US10890278 both titled “Expandable and Contractible Garden Hose.” Vieneci is accused of patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § Vieneci Garden, Inc.

Patent Infringement 40

Patent Infringement Patent Television Designs 40

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 30, 2021

9,261,365 (the “‘365 Patent”). The ‘365 Patent is titled “Device, System and Method for Remotely Entering, Storing and Sharing Addresses for a Positional Information Device.” Because Social claims the Product infringes on at least Claim 1 of the ‘365 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 14, 2023

Batesville”), for patent infringement. Batesville is accused of patent infringement against Patent No.’s Plaintiff is requesting a judgment that the Defendants willfully infringed upon Plaintiff’s patents, injunctive relief, damages together with interest and costs under Lanham Act 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Infringement 40

Patent Infringement Social Media Patent Designs 40

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 28, 2021

9,054,860 (the “‘860 Patent”) for a Digital Verified Identification System and Method. According to the Complaint, Formstack, LLC (“Formstack”), the Defendant, offers at least one Product, Formstack Sign, that infringes one or more claims of the ‘860 Patent. The case was assigned to Judge Richard L.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 9, 2021

Vaxxinova is the owner of three patents at issue, all entitled “Immunizing Compositions and Methods of Use,” U.S. Patent Nos. 8,282,941 , 7,943,150 , and 7,943,151 (collectively the “Patents in Suit”). Elanco”), during potential business negotiations.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Technology Business 52

Intepat

DECEMBER 26, 2023

In the contemporary era, AI plays a significant role in Intellectual Property Rights, becoming increasingly integral during a period where numerous tasks are executed by artificial intelligence. Consequently, it is imperative to recognize that the use of AI itself has become a component of Intellectual Property.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Intellectual Property Law Personality Rights 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 25, 2021

Johnson claims it owns multiple utility and design patents including those at issue in this case, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,022,332 , 10,684,029 , 10,528,013 , 8,826,165 , 8,190,728 , D788,785 , D924,888 , D924,890 (collectively, “Asserted Patents”). The case was assigned to Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Design Patent Technology 52

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021

I was tasked with creating business and marketing materials for the Engineering and Technology practice group, focusing mainly on topics pertaining to patent prosecution. One of the skills I sharpened over the course of my internship was effective and accessible legal writing.

Business 115

Business IP Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 115

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 21, 2023

15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. Design Patent No. Background Columbia asserted U.S.

Art 162

Art Design Patent Designs Design 162

IPilogue

AUGUST 24, 2022

NPEs are a special type of entity that specifically purchases patents or patent rights but does not commodify the patent. The second kind, private parties, often use the patents they acquire for profit through damage or settlement awards, or royalties and licensing rights. So why are they still allowed to operate?

Litigation 106

Litigation Patent Troll Patent Technology 106

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JANUARY 15, 2024

In the modern era of technological advancements and the burgeoning landscape of online commerce, the interconnection of patent law with the dynamics of e-commerce platforms presents intricate challenges. 11,473,277 (“the ‘277 Patent”) against specific Xin Glass Rinsers listed by Sanitary Ware on Amazon.

Patent 52

Patent Patent Infringement Patent Law Technology 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 8, 2023

Save the Date to Attend the 16 th Annual USPTO Design Day The 2023 iteration of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s annual Design Day will be held on May 4, 2023, with options to attend either in-person at USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia or virtually.

Designs 40

Designs Design Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 40

Intellectual Property Law Blog

APRIL 5, 2021

This article originally appeared in The Intellectual Property Strategist. Companies have historically turned to patent pools as vehicles for achieving shared objectives. A patent pool can be formed when a group of patent holders agree to pool their patents for some purpose. © 2021 ALM Media LLC.

Patent 100

Patent Licensing Intellectual Property Technology 100

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

OCTOBER 20, 2023

for alleged patent infringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. According to the complaint, Rogue Fitness owns several design and utility patents for fitness equipment, including Patent No. RE49,513 : “Barbell.”

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Advertising Advertising 52

Intepat

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

While historically, the field of patent filing has been dominated by men, an inspiring shift is taking place. Women inventors are making significant strides, leaving an indelible mark on the world of innovation and intellectual property. In 1809, Mary Dixon was the 1st Woman to receive the US Patent.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 52

Kashishipr

FEBRUARY 9, 2022

To be specific, market research performed before filing a Patent Application or after obtaining Patent Protection may help an inventor or innovator significantly in examining the business environment for his invention or innovation. Market research may also help down the road in preventing Patent Infringement actions.

Marketing 119

Marketing Marketing Inventor Invention 119

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 2, 2021

New Albany, Indiana – Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed a patent infringement suit filed by Plaintiff, Eddie M. infringed on his U.S. Green”) in March 2020 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Green, who claimed Defendants, Ara Yavruyan and Chain Vault Inc.,

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent 52