Patently-O

APRIL 16, 2022

The text of the Patent Act suggests that obviousness is a straightforward inquiry: find how the claimed invention differs from the prior art and ask whether, based upon those differences, an objective artisan would deem the invention obvious. Von Langsdorff Licensing Ltd. , Von Langsdorff Licensing Ltd. ,

Invention 99

Invention Patent Art Licensing 99

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

Look no further as we present to you the SpicyIP Weekly Review, highlighting the discussions that took place on the blog along with other IP news. Passing the present order, the court clarified that the application for interim injunction cannot be kept pending and requires prima facie findings on merit. Burger King Corporation v.

Cease and Desist 105

Cease and Desist Copyright Infringement Invention Social Media 105

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 13, 2022

Compulsory licensing is a highly debated question of the hour in the context of the pandemic. The present case deals with the compulsory license awarded to a domestic generic pharmaceutical private company, Natco, for the manufacture and sale of the kidney cancer drug Nexavar, patented by Bayer Corporation in India.

Licensing 52

Licensing Government Invention Patent 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 23, 2023

Highlights of the Week Examining Oppositions: Time for a Deeper Look Recently a monograph on patent oppositions was published by HNLU, Raipur and was presented to the DPIIT with suggestions on streamlining patent opposition process and enabling ease of doing business in India. Other Posts COVID-19 Vaccine Patent Infringement?

Designs 105

Designs Design Invention Registration 105

Patently-O

OCTOBER 5, 2021

Like the dissenting judge on the panel, several of the opinions denying rehearing en banc faulted the panel majority for establishing a new “nothing more” test—if the claimed invention “clearly invokes a natural law, and nothing more, to accomplish a desired result”—for patent ineligibility. patent enforcement and litigation; c.

Patent 102

Patent Intellectual Property Invention Inventor 102

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 18, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) states, ” a trademark protects brand names and logos used on goods and services. A patent protects an invention. For example, if you invent a new kind of vacuum cleaner, you would apply for a patent to protect the invention itself.”

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Invention Business Artistic Work 52

Intepat

MAY 18, 2023

These standards are established due to the level of effectiveness that the invention might have achieved. The patents behind such technologies and innovations are called standard essential patents as they are essential for manufacturers to incorporate into their products in order for the same to work efficiently.

Patent 52

Patent Licensing Intellectual Property Technology 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 1, 2022

This is because many patents are granted upon products that improve other patented products. To the extent the improvements incorporate, in whole, a patented claim held by a third party, a license may be required to commercialize the improvement. to determine if any enforceable patents cover the components in question.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Art Technology Patent Infringement 52

IIPRD

OCTOBER 17, 2022

Patent and Trademark Office last year, which it has since checked by way of its Nikeland venture on Roblox and the acquisition of RTFKT. In the present case too there will be many legal issues related to Intellectual Property. Trademark Infringement. Patent Infringement. Conclusion and Suggestions.

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Trademark 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 23, 2024

The plaintiffs were the licensees of Ibrutinib, which was also being manufactured and sold by several generic medicine companies (defendants), without a license, under various brand names. The Ibrutinib patent is set to expire in 2026. In an appeal, the IPAB set aside the impugned rejection and restored the above patent.

Intellectual Property 129

Intellectual Property Patent Blogging Marketing 129

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Intellectual property rights (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPR’) are the legal rights granted to the inventor or creator to safeguard his or her invention or production for a certain period of time. These legal rights grant the inventor, creator, or assignee the only right to fully exploit his invention/creation for a given period.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Government Inventor 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

Highlights of the Week Hot-Tubbing in Indian IP Litigation: Delhi High Court Issues Directives in High-Stakes Patent Infringement Case Image from [link] here Recently, the DHC issued directives regarding expert evidence in the Perjeta patent litigation. Anything we are missing out on? Please let us know in the comments below.

Trademark 59

Trademark Registration Copyright Patent 59

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 2, 2022

Kollective Technology ) that reversed a lower court dismissal of a patent infringement case on Section 101 eligibility grounds under the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice Corp. ” In comparison to a 2018 decision ( Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. CLS Bank test. Just weeks after that ruling, the Federal Circuit in IBM v.

Patent 59

Patent Technology Invention Art 59

IP Tech Blog

NOVEMBER 2, 2022

Kollective Technology ) that reversed a lower court dismissal of a patent infringement case on Section 101 eligibility grounds under the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice Corp. Zillow ruled on another appeal from a dismissal on eligibility grounds in a case also involving IT patents. CLS Bank test. LG Electronics, Inc.,

Patent 57

Patent Technology Invention Art 57

More Than Your Mark

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

Despite the widely diverging needs of the different industries that make use of the US patent system, US patent law applies essentially the same rules to innovations from all technology fields. This means that drug and biotechnology-based inventions are treated no differently by the U.S. Biosimilars.

IP 52

IP Marketing Marketing Invention 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

DECEMBER 2, 2020

iii] This tension between state and federal law presents obstacles for cannabis entrepreneurs. While federal trademark registration is the strongest form of protection, it also presents the greatest challenges for canna-brands, as most forms of cannabis are considered illegal substances under federal law. Patent Prosecution.

IP 52

IP Registration Trademark Branding 52

SpicyIP

JULY 10, 2023

The defendant further submitted that while extending the term of the patent in the US, the plaintiff has accepted the suit patent for Regorafenib to be disclosed in the genus patent and later argued that the application for specie patent was rejected in Columbia and Argentina, for lacking an inventive step.

Registration 98

Registration Copyright Infringement Trademark Copyright 98

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 30, 2022

Part I of this post explored the increasing number of trade secret cases being presented to juries for damages, rather than to a judge for an injunction. In sum, to the extent that trade secret protection displaces patent protection in some emerging technologies, trade secret litigation will continue to boom.

Litigation 52

Litigation Technology Invention Inventor 52

The IPKat

APRIL 5, 2023

The AmeriKat hunkering down to a belated Christmas meal of kibble Back in the dark depths of January, the great, the good and the cold of patents practitioners were invited to gather at Hogan Lovells’ London office to attend the AIPPI’s annual patent round-up. Sam Krips from Hogan Lovells was on hand to report on the proceedings.

Reporting 73

Reporting Patent Patent Infringement Technology 73

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2023

The respondent had rejected the appellant’s application for a patent on “a Low-Cost Programmable HVAC Controller Having Limited Memory Resources” by merely noting what the First Examination report had held and did not provide adequate deliberation or consideration on applicability of Section 3(k) in the present case.

Confidentiality 105

Confidentiality Trademark Copyright Patent 105

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 17, 2023

vs Controller Of Patents on 8 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Emerson’s appeals under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, contest the rejection of patent applications (Nos. 1253/DEL/2006 and 4197/DEL/2015) related to computer software based on earlier guidelines of the patent office. Bn Award.

IP 59

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 59

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2022

But the Texas courts found no taking, reasoning that nothing was taken from the photographer as he still had the right to use, and license others to use, his photographs. 92, 96 (1876) (“A patent for an invention is as much property as a patent for land. See Jim Olive Photography, d/b/a Photolive, Inc., 2d 480 (Fed.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Invention Copyright 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 4, 2021

.” The legal standard for such cases is close to that used for declaratory judgment actions, i.e., a petitioner must have some real concern that it could face an imminent suit for patent infringement. For example, in Papst Licensing GmbH v. The Federal Circuit in 2020 continued an ongoing process of sharpening that law.

Art 40

Art Litigation Invention Technology 40

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

IP includes any creation of the mind, including inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names, images, and designs, and various forms of IP protection cover these different categories. Patent Prosecution, Portfolio, and Strategic Patenting Considerations.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Journalism IP 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 11, 2022

FDA granted BI a “listening meeting” on March 17, 2021 in which BI presented its position and answered questions from FDA. What is the nature and type of information that a sponsor should provide to support a postapproval manufacturing change for a licensed biosimilar product? Patent infringement. Patent Infringement.

Litigation 52

Litigation Settlement Patent Marketing 52