Remove is-software-patentable
article thumbnail

Software Patents: When is enough enough?

LexBlog IP

Software Patents: When is enough enough? [1]. Developing a Disclosure for Software Patents : Discuss with the inventor the technological underpinnings of the novel functional aspects of the software and how those technological considerations support that function.

article thumbnail

AI Systems May Invent, But Are They Inventors?

The IP Law Blog

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? That may have been done by the AI system, which raises the question as to who is the inventor of the invention created by that system.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Do you have to list an Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an inventor or joint inventor on a Patent Application?

LexBlog IP

part of a patent claim), does the AI system need to be listed as an “inventor”? patent law, an inventor is one who contributes to the conception of at least one claim element of a given patent claim (i.e., patent law. patent law. Conception is important because, at least under U.S.

article thumbnail

Caso DABUS: la Corte Suprema del Regno Unito respinge il ricorso del Dott. Thaler, confermando che un sistema di intelligenza artificiale non può essere nominato inventore ai sensi dell’UK Patents Act 1977

LexBlog IP

Stephen Thaler, nelle quali veniva designato come unico inventore il sistema di intelligenza artificiale “DABUS”, di proprietà dello stesso Dott. Stephen Thaler. Le due domande erano state inizialmente respinte dall’UKIPO nel 2019 (decisione disponibile qui ), sostenendo che il Dott. §§ 54-73).

article thumbnail

A Split Develops: Can Artificial Intelligence Invent Stuff?

JD Supra Law

There is a split developing in the world over whether artificial intelligence software (AI) can be listed as an inventor on a patent application. In September 2021, the district court held that there was “overwhelming evidence” that Congress defined the term inventor in the Patent Act to include only natural persons.

Invention 145
article thumbnail

Taylor v. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP: A Cautionary Tale for Inventors and Startups

Patently-O

The case offers a few key takeaways for entrepreneurs delving into the patent system. Background : William Taylor and his business partner developed a software application called SafeCell and assigned the patent rights to their startup company W2W. They hired Hunton AK to handle the patent application process.

article thumbnail

Why including an “Algorithm” is Important for Software Patents (Part 2)

LexBlog IP

PatentNext Summary: In some instances, software-based patent applications can fail to include a sufficient algorithm describing “how” the software interacts with the underlying hardware of the invention. Therefore, as a general rule, software-related patents should include an algorithm.