Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

Fed. Circ. Probes Claim Construction In Phone Patent Row

IP Law 360

A panel of Federal Circuit judges on Monday dove into the interpretation of "a microprocessor" in a case reexamining whether major telecommunications companies infringed an inventor's patent for a wireless communication device after he argued a lower court's claim construction was flawed.

article thumbnail

Challenging the Validity of a Patent: The Supreme Court Minerva Decision

More Than Your Mark

Hologic, Incorporated that the doctrine of assignor estoppel (a rule that prevents people who assign their patents to a company from then challenging the validity of their patent) is alive and well, but subject to certain important exceptions. The Validity of a Patent. Implications for Inventors and Businesses.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Proving Printed Publications

Patently-O

Folks continue to file anonymous ex parte reexaminations. Design Patent No. The reexamination examiner agreed with the challenge and issued a final rejection that the claimed design was anticipated by four different prior art references. Ex parte Zhang , Reexam No. 90/014,234, 2021 WL 633718 (PTAB).

article thumbnail

Nobody Wants To Defend Ax Of Drain Device IP, Fed. Circ. Told

IP Law 360

An inventor has asked the Federal Circuit to reverse an inter partes reexamination decision that invalidated his patent covering a device for unclogging drains — asserted in a decade-old New Jersey lawsuit — and that he says was "so weak that no one will appear to defend it."

article thumbnail

Fish & Richardson Attorneys Named Recipients of the 2020 Patent Pro Bono Achievement Certificate

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Fish & Richardson is proud to announce that six of its attorneys were named recipients of the Pro Bono Achievement Certificate by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This recognition acknowledges those law firms and attorneys who help make the Patent Pro Bono Program a success. Jacqueline Tio – Georgia PATENTS.

article thumbnail

A Request for Grace Period for a Novelty Art Should Be Submitted Within Two Months When the Patentee Knew or Should Have Known About the Novelty Art After the Patent Application Was Filed

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. within six months before the priority date of the ’987 patent), and all the inventors of the ’987 patent are also authors of the article.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Human vs AI Analysis of USPTO Updates – How Does Bard Fare?

IP Tech Blog

To evaluate the capabilities of Generative AI, we selected the USPTO’s recent announcement about grants of digital patents as a topic, and compared a blog that we prepared and a blog that Generative AI (here, Google Bard) prepared. A sample of this new eGrant patent is available here. 35 U.S.C. §