Remove what-is-likelihood-of-confusion
article thumbnail

America’s trademark litigation gravy train – the Bratz / Barbie case is back!

Likelihood of Confusion

I can’t claim to be keeping close tabs on what’s going on in theBarbie / Bratz trademark litigation. The post America’s trademark litigation gravy train – the Bratz / Barbie case is back! appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. doesn’t.

article thumbnail

TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Lack of Bona Fide Intent Claim, Grants Applicant's Motion to Amend Answer to Add Collateral Estoppel Defense

The TTABlog

However, the Board found that material issues of fact precluded the grant of summary judgment as to Monster's likelihood of confusion and dilution claims. However, the Board found that material issues of fact precluded the grant of summary judgment as to Monster's likelihood of confusion and dilution claims. for others).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Professor McCarthy: "Some Thoughts on the Supreme Court Jack Daniel's Case"

The TTABlog

Thomas McCarthy shares his thoughts (below) on the Supreme Court's "Bad Spaniels" decision (pdf here ), in the hope of stimulating discussion (in the comments) as to what readers think will be the impact of the case on the use of marks in "expressive" works. As you will recall, the Court vacated the decision of the U.S.

article thumbnail

Four Thoughts Before Bringing a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Traverse Legal Blog

There are three distinct elements necessary to establish a trademark infringement claim; use, in commerce and likelihood of confusion. If the infringer does not comply, this cease and desist letter now becomes evidence in your trademark infringement litigation. TRADEMARK LITIGATION IS EXPENSIVE & TIME CONSUMING.

article thumbnail

Going Back to First Principles – A Nuanced Understanding of Infringement in Google v DRS

SpicyIP

Aditya is an attorney at Ira Law and represents Google in trademark litigation relating to keyword advertising. These key questions i.e., what is the objective behind a user’s search and what is the purpose of a search engine form an important focal point of the Delhi High Court’s decision in Google v. Amit Sibal. DRS Logistics.

article thumbnail

state consumer protection law gives competitor plaintiff more leeway than Lanham Act, court holds

43(B)log

But Core-Brace failed to show literal falsity or provide extrinsic evidence of actual confusion. Also, even though SBC had produced less than 9 BRBs, it wasn’t literally false to say what it could produce. One of the defendants (Hinchman) used to work for plaintiff SME. I’m going to ignore the patent claims.

article thumbnail

Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Colibri

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Though the court says it’s a close question, the court says that the plaintiff does not have a likelihood of success on the merits. To analyze this, the court applies the standard likelihood of consumer confusion factors. The litigants directly compete. The litigants directly compete. ” Actual confused.