IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 30, 2022
trademark and patent registrations will not protect rights holders’ IP in the Philippines. The Philippines Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL) maintains a registry of patents and trademarks that is widely recognized in Southeast Asia. A trademark applicant may be a natural or juridical person. For example, U.S.
The TTABlog
NOVEMBER 10, 2022
In an ownership dispute that "has the makings of a country song," the Board found that legendary country singer Cowboy Jack Clement and Opposer Clementvision, Inc., a company he formed, owned the mark THE COWBOY ARMS HOTEL AND RECORDING SPA for approximately 38 years before Cowboy Jack passed away in 2013.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TraskBritt Intellectual Property
MARCH 18, 2021
Intellectual property law includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets and is an important consideration for any new business. This article will address trademarks and copyrights, but the law firm of TraskBritt can assist with any intellectual property law needs. Trademarks and copyrights offer different protections.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
All companies ensure that their domain names co-relate with their respective trademarks. It helps the consumer correlate and identify the company based on their trademark. It prohibited the defendants from using the name “yahooindia.com” They could not use any other trademark that is alike the plaintiff’s brand.
The TTABlog
OCTOBER 6, 2022
TTABlog Test: Is HI-FI Confusable With HIGH FIDELITY for Overlapping Marketing Services ? Yes] TTAB Orders Cancellation of CAPTAIN CANNABIS Registration for Comic Books: Petitioner Proved Priority By Use Analogous to Trademark Use TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? Abandonment: Precedential No.
The TTABlog
SEPTEMBER 23, 2022
Its evidence regarding its first rendering of services under the mark was "characterized by contradictions, inconsistencies, and indefiniteness." Its claim of use analogous to trademark use failed because its prior publicity "was not sufficiently clear, widespread and repetitive." Emphasis by the Board). See Couture v.
The TTABlog
OCTOBER 10, 2023
The Board found opposer's mark to be "inherently distinctive and conceptually strong, of average commercial strength." And the parties’ market interface weighed slightly in favor of opposer "to the extent the parties acknowledged a need for Applicant to choose a non-confusingly similar mark."
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
92 
Let's personalize your content