topics judicial-districts 
Patently-O
DECEMBER 31, 2021
The third agenda topic I would like to highlight is an arcane but important matter of judicial administration: judicial assignment and venue for patent cases in federal trial court. Two important and sometimes competing values are at issue.
Patently-O
MAY 23, 2022
Menell, Koret Professor of Law; Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; Faculty Director, Berkeley Judicial Institute; University of California at Berkeley School of Law. Prior to the mid-1990s, patent litigation took place in district court silos. Dennis Crouch referred to it as the Bible for patent litigators.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
MARCH 9, 2023
The case deals with the topic of whether the registration of slogans is allowed by EU trade mark law. Katfriend Paolo Maria Gangi reviewed the decision of the Southern District Court of New York , issued on 14 February 2023, seeing the French Luxury House Hermès against NFT creator Rothschild.
Patently-O
JUNE 15, 2022
UMass’s claimed invention is a topical skin care product containing adenosine that is applied to the skin. The Federal Circuit could plausibly have affirmed on indefiniteness in my non-judicial opinion. L’Oréal both responded on the indefiniteness point and advanced its own claim construction argument. ” Slip Op.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
The Georgia District Court agreed , and UNOS appealed. ” Concerns about trade secrets or other proprietary information are particularly relevant and are not taken lightly; such concerns can overcome the public interest in access to judicial documents. .”
Patently-O
MARCH 31, 2024
In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a judgment of invalidity and remanded for a new trial, holding that the district court’s jury instruction on objective indicia of nonobviousness constituted prejudicial legal error. The district court construed several key claim terms. The case, Inline Plastics Corp.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 7, 2022
Later, those two companies formed an official partnership to develop a C3-binding protein (the same topic for which Amyndas had shared data). Zealand’s patent applications also published relating to the same topic. But, the DTSA gave Federal District Court original jurisdiction over trade secret actions. ” Id.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
64 
Let's personalize your content