Remove topics judicial-proceedings
article thumbnail

WIPO publishes Guide to Patent Case Management for Judges

The IPKat

Vision for the IP judiciary In addition to the full guide, available in PDF and in HTML, readers are able to create their own custom guide for any combination of jurisdictions and topics covered in the Guide, by clicking on the “Build custom guide” tab in the top banner or at this link.

article thumbnail

A patent small claims court – what do you think?

Patently-O

the United States should develop a small claims proceeding for patent. Given ongoing interest in the topic, USPTO has engaged ACUS to conduct. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. Opportunities for administrative and/or judicial review of small claims. 18, 2012)). provide; 8.

Patent 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Understanding the International Guide to Patent Case Management for Judges by WIPO

SpicyIP

The broad parameters in the report include structural reform of courts, statutory revisions, implementation of innovative court practices, and judicial education et al. The administrative review proceedings under IPAB have been briefly dealt with.

Patent 105
article thumbnail

Around the IP Blogs

The IPKat

The blog questioned the judge’s decision to rely solely on a phonetic comparison of signs, and to apply an Australian precedent directly to an Indian judicial proceeding. For Kat readers, interested in the topic, this Kat also recommends a recent study on dynamic blocking injunctions in the EU.

Blogging 113
article thumbnail

Patent Case Management Goes Cross-Institutional and Global

Patently-O

Menell, Koret Professor of Law; Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; Faculty Director, Berkeley Judicial Institute; University of California at Berkeley School of Law. In conjunction with Eun-Joo Min, Director of the WIPO Judicial Institute, and Judge (ret.) Guest post by Peter S. Judge (ret.) chapter.

Patent 67
article thumbnail

Event Report: BIE Symposium raises questions on Arrow declarations in the UPC

The IPKat

Kat friends Tobias Cohen Jehoram and Emilia Zalewska were on hand to report on the proceedings for the Kat's readers. After this, they discussed a set of various topics related to the RoP and the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA). However, in such cases, they are not permitted to act as representatives before the UPC.

article thumbnail

Never too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

The IPKat

The case deals with the topic of whether the registration of slogans is allowed by EU trade mark law. Kat friends Gillian Tan and Mark Teng discussed a recent decision issued by the Court of Appeal of Singapore clarifying the meaning and application of Singapore's judicial understanding of “distinctiveness”.