Remove topics royalties
article thumbnail

Why Spotify Removed So Many Comedy Albums

Plagiarism Today

Note: This will be an extremely brief overview of music licensing, for more details, check out this 2017 article on the topic. Comedians have historically received royalties for their recordings, often through their labels, but have not received them for the composition. A Quick Dive into Music (and Comedy) Licensing.

Music 214
article thumbnail

Sunday Surprises

The IPKat

OxFirst’s FRAND Royalty Rate Determination - Tuesday 25 April The webinar will consider the topic related to how to determine FRAND royalty rates in relation to Standard Essential Patents.

IP 67
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Around the IP Blogs

The IPKat

The new guidelines cover topics such as formality examination and procedures for trade mark applications, oppositions, declarations of invalidity, cancellations, classification of goods and services, examination of applications for change of trade mark ownership, trade mark renewal and other procedural issues. Is overblocking real?

Blogging 115
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Januarys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Then, Arundathi Venkataraman discussed the topic using the case of Garcia v. Before I wrap this story, let’s not miss this recent post about the Agreement on Royalty Sharing Signed between ISRA and Music Labels , where Surmayi discussed whether Singers (a type of performer) are entitled to royalties for sound recordings.

article thumbnail

Event Report: BIE Symposium raises questions on Arrow declarations in the UPC

The IPKat

After this, they discussed a set of various topics related to the RoP and the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA). Another topic related to the way judges interpret the RoP, as these leave some room for the judges to apply their national interpretation norms. The last point raised by the audience concerned FRAND.

article thumbnail

Unpacking IDC v Lenovo (Part IV): top-down cross check; allegations regarding conduct; permission to appeal

The IPKat

InterDigital proposed that the total aggregate royalty burden equals the aggregate royalty burden of InterDigital divided by InterDigital’s share of the patents assessed as essential for that generation of technology ([821]). Then it moved on to the inevitable topic of appeal. InterDigital advanced four grounds of appeal.

article thumbnail

Informal innovation: The re-emergence of ‘informal’ washing machines

SpicyIP

Image from here A topic close to this blog’s heart – informal innovation, recently made headlines. Efforts were made to commercialise this innovation – re-designing to lower costs, a patent was filed, licensing and royalty sharing agreements were entered into, but mostly in vain, at least in India.

Marketing 126