topics standard-of-proof 
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
The standard principle that abbreviations of descriptive terms become inherently descriptive when used as such, and the relevant public, acknowledges them as being identical to the full descriptive meaning, does not apply here either, at least not in our opinion. Apparently, the hype emerged not on instigation of the trademark proprietor.
The IPKat
APRIL 27, 2023
Kat Friends Hanne Kirk and Charlotte Mittet Høfler analysed a recent Danish Supreme Court decision regarding the infringement of copyright in pottery, which held that the nature and the severity of the infringement provided a basis for lowering the requirement for proof of the amount of the loss.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Plagiarism Today
AUGUST 3, 2022
But I brought up a thing I read during a convo about a topic that didn't feature his work in any way. Katz took to Twitter to call out the Chilluminati Podcast for allegedly plagiarizing from his book, Gangsters of Capitalism. pic.twitter.com/ZQzV38EQzY — Jonathan M. pic.twitter.com/ZQzV38EQzY — Jonathan M.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
During discovery, the hospitals argued that certain of UNOS’s emails exposed “bad faith and improper behavior” in its policymaking process and should be unsealed and considered as proof that the policy change was arbitrary, capricious, and the result of a denial of due process.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 2, 2023
evidence that was not public before the filing date of the patent in suit and was filed after that date) as proof that the problem has been solved (i.e. evidence that was not public before the filing date of the patent in suit and was filed after that date) as proof that the problem has been solved (i.e.
The IPKat
AUGUST 4, 2021
not to be a standard, recognised phrase, so its meaning will not be universally understood per the language and cultural habits of the general public: According to the interpretation of the Xinhua Dictionary, the common meaning of ‘?’ On 29 November 2017, an individual named Seng Lei (‘Seng’) filed an application (No. is ‘eating’.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 21, 2023
This is one of several ideologically motivated lawsuits against YouTube for allegedly engaging in “discriminatory” content moderation. The initial cohort of plaintiffs were conservatives (Prager); but then as a purported “gotcha,” the law firm added LGBTQ (Divino) and people of color (Newman) plaintiff cohorts.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
76 
Let's personalize your content