LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

The China National Intellectual Property Association (CNIPA) has recently published a draft amendment to the Chinese Trademark Law. If adopted in its current version and without further modifications, this amendment would have a considerable impact on many aspects of trademark law and practice in China.

Trademark 52

Trademark Trademark Law Registration Intellectual Property 52

IPilogue

AUGUST 4, 2022

The applicant, Beijing Judian Restaurant Co (“Judian”), has operated restaurants in Vancouver and Richmond since 2018, along with numerous well-known ( served over 5,750,000 customers between 2011 and 2019 ) restaurants in China since 2005. The applicant noted similar provisions in EU and UK trademark law that have been adjudicated.

Trademark 115

Trademark Registration Designs Design 115

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 17, 2021

This article was originally written as a requirement for Victoria Burke and John Begakis’ course on Fashion Law. Trademark Infringement / Anti-Dilution – Nike v Warren Lotas. Warren Lotas partnered with Jeff Staple to “reinterpret” Staple’s original 2005 collaboration with Nike on the classic Nike Dunk shoe.

Trademark 106

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 106

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 1, 2023

Author: Deepti, A student at Faculty of law, Delhi university , in case of any queries please contact/write back to us at support@ipandlegalfilings.com or IP & Legal Filing References Statutes – The Trademarks Act 1999 Articles [link] [link] [link] US and Indian Trademark Law: A Comparison by Murugendra B.

Trademark 91

Trademark Registering Trademarks Branding Brands 91

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 4, 2022

However, needless to mention, the time frame for transition period should be in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 65, and thus the general transition period for developing countries who join after 1 January 2005 should not be authorized for claiming the period, and neither for the LDCs joining after 1 January 2006. Article 67.

IP 64

IP Intellectual Property Law Trademark Law 64

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JANUARY 17, 2022

In this article, I have analyzed how personal names be granted protection under the trademark law. Section 9(1)(a), Indian Trademark Act, 1999 Section 2m, Indian Trademark Act, 1999 Jaleel Associates vs Hotel Sagar 2005 (1) KLT 757 Decided on 3.12.2004 Section 32, Indian Trademark Act, 1999 Prathiba M.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registering Trademarks Registration Licensing 52

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 11, 2023

19] Being able to distinguish one’s trademark falls at the centre of the trademark law, as otherwise, it is liable to be rejected under Section 9(1) of the Act. ‘Distinctive’ means distinguishing a person’s goods and services from competing goods or services of another. [19] LEGAL STUD.

Trademark 80

Trademark Registration Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 80

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 29, 2022

1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. Some “highlights” of 1-800 Contacts’ trademark jurisprudence over the years: 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU (2d Cir.

Trademark 108

Trademark Advertising Advertising Blogging 108

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 23, 2023

The first was a case where Petronet tried using the law on confidentiality to gag reportage and the second was a case where the Tata group in an uncharacteristic lapse of judgement tried using trademark law to shut down a website setup by Greenpeace.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Law IP 52

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

However, it may be more appropriate to consider trademark law as a comparable framework for comprehending the extent of the personality right. National Law School of India Review , 31 (1), 125–148. What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law. Stanford Law Review , 58 (4), 1161–1220.

Personality Rights 62

Personality Rights Privacy Social Media Intellectual Property 62

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Jaitley’s right and pronounced that any person may be restrained from using the names of popular or well-known celebrities, when the particular name is a well-known trademark as envisaged under the basic principles of trademark law and thatcelebrity is entitled to use his name for commercial purposes. 2662/2011 Douglas v.

Privacy 97

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 97