article thumbnail

TTAB Orders Cancellation of "THE PLIMSOULS" Registration on Ownership and Likelihood of Confusion Grounds, Rejects Abandonment Claim

The TTABlog

The Board ruled that the band was entitled to challenge the registration, had not abandoned the mark, and had proved its claim of ownership of the mark and likelihood of confusion based on its prior use of the same mark for the same services. Text Copyright John L. The Plimsouls v. Edward David Munoz , Cancellation No. Welch 2024.

Ownership 108
article thumbnail

Matricide, Movies and Salinger

Dear Rich IP Blog

I have read that the "change of ownership" of this collection is considered a publication. Included in the collection is an undated typewritten poem by the daughter-murderer (who died in 2007), probably written 1944-1949. Is there any chance that the poem and letters are copyrighted? Is there copyright? Is that correct?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court’s Unsettling Attempt at Settling the Debate on Section 63 of the Copyright Act

SpicyIP

We’re pleased to bring you a guest post on a recent Supreme Court order where certain offences under the Copyright Act were held to be cognizable and non-bailable. The Supreme Court’s Unsettling Attempt at Settling the Debate on Section 63 of the Copyright Act. Sureshkumar S/o Kumaran v the Sub Inspector of Police, 2007.

Copyright 137
article thumbnail

The Choice Of Law Debate In Copyright Infringement

IP and Legal Filings

Copyright is a more complicated problem. Per Article 5(2) of the Berne Convention [9] , copyright is established without the need for any further procedures. Since copyright is “universal”, some argue that the lex originis should be utilised to determine who owns works that have been plagiarised.

article thumbnail

Copyright Goes Bananas: District Court Rejects Maurizio Cattelan’s Motion to Dismiss Copyright Claim Against His Taped Banana

LexBlog IP

Morford cannot claim ownership over a natural element (a fruit) and a functional component (duct tape). copyright law does not protect “elements of expression that nature displays for all observers,” [8] which, according to Cattelan, excludes the main components of Morford’s artwork. ” [9]. ” [11].

article thumbnail

IPSC Breakout Session #4 Innovation/Copyright

43(B)log

Mark Schultz, Video on Demand Services: New Frontiers in Regulation of Cultural Policy, Industrial Policy & Copyright Streaming took off, and regulation was close behind, motivated by concerns about culture. Regulating terms of trade also permitted, including © ownership/exclusivity/restricting investment in local productions.

article thumbnail

The Narrative of One’s Life: A Sneak Peek Into the “Who is the Bad Art Friend?” Controversy

IPilogue

A literary controversy surrounding a copyright claim has taken over the North American online writing community, and it involves a kidney donation, a private Facebook group, and a short story.? . Copyright Office. In order to prove copyright infringement , Ms. Dorland registered her donor letter with the U.S. 3d 12, 18 ).

Art 105