LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

A few years later, in 1984, Goldsmith’s agency, which had retained the rights to those images, licensed one of them to Vanity Fair for use in an article called “Purple Fame.” Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement. Vanity Fair , in turn, commissioned Warhol to make a silkscreen using Goldsmith’s photograph.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 20, 2023

With further ado, here’s what I found in Novembers: Database Protection in India: Since Prof Basheer’s 2005 post about the inaccurate implication of the theft of data as copyright infringement, to 2023, not much seems to have changed. The Indian courts have further clarified this issue. see also Sourav Ganguly vs Tata Tea ).

Personality Rights 59

Personality Rights IP Licensing Copyright 59

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Restellini alleged copyright infringement and related claims in connection with WPI’s digitization of certain material about the artist Amodeo Modigliani. WPI counterclaimed against Restellini and third-party Institut Restellini SAS – Documentation Centre alleging copyright infringement and false advertising.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Artwork IP Advertising 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 13, 2023

. — One logical starting point to tell the history of copyright preemption of contracts is to begin with ProCD v. In return for users agreeing to the TOU, Craigslist provides services to its users “including but not limited to classified advertising, forums, and email forwarding.” TOU at 6-7. ” TOU at 1.

Blogging 84

Blogging Copyright Contracts Cease and Desist 84

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Nathan directed the allegedly infringing 2013 Documentary, which “tells the story of Pug, a thirteen-year-old child who wants to be a ‘12 O’Clock Boy,’ just like [he] has repeatedly watched in [the 2001 and 2003 Documentaries].” Defendants' 2013 documentary Both parties’ works are “docu-fiction” set in Baltimore. Nathan, F.Supp.3d

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

TorrentFreak

DECEMBER 2, 2021

Hollywood & Netflix File Copyright Infringement Lawsuit. Defendants use the Copyrighted Works as the bait to lure the largest possible audience, so that Defendants will profit from advertisements shown to their users. Advertising and Referral Schemes. Copyright Infringement Claims.

Advertising 127

Advertising Advertising Copying Copyright Infringement 127

The IPKat

JUNE 23, 2022

Fenty v Arcadia [2013] EWHC 1945 (Ch) confirmed a long line of authority that this kind of evidence was admissible. A claim for copyright infringement and passing off was issued in December 2019. Retromark rarely strays into copyright, but that was the main basis of Shazam’s successful claim.

Branding 73

Branding Brands Branding Litigation 73

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

Such an interpretation allows for a patentee to claim a right to prohibit another party’s export of allegedly infringing goods, thus going beyond what the statute actually offers. This judgment concerned the classification of payments under end-user license agreements (EULA). Engineering Analysis Centre for Excellence Pvt.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143

SpicyIP

JANUARY 16, 2023

On this, Aparajita discussed the inherent public interest involved in accessing this information and argues how the disclosure of the COVID-19 vaccine license is a global norm and is followed by the US and the UK. Mumbai Port Trust, the government is obligated to provide the access to these licenses. Other Posts. Other Developments.

Trademark 102

Trademark Designs Design Registration 102

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

But Lewis thought the song was a rip-off of “I Want a New Drug” and asserted a copyright infringement claim against Columbia Pictures. ” In 2004, video game publisher Capcom contacted MKR, the film’s producer, to inquire about about obtaining a license to use elements from the film in one of its games.

Copyright 144

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 144

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

the Apex Court held that one of the inherent aspects of the right to privacy as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution is the right to prevent others from using the person’s name or likeness without his consent for advertising or non-advertising purposes. State of T.N., InRaja Pocket Books v. 2007, I, no. 125, pourvoi no.

Privacy 97

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 97