Remove 2016 Remove Designs Remove Invention Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Patenting Software And Computer-Implemented Inventions In Southeast Asia  

LexBlog IP

PatentNext Summary: Software and computer-implemented inventions (CII) have experienced explosive growth in recent years. There has been explosive growth in software and computer-implemented inventions (CII), including in specialized areas such as Artificial Intelligence. Ryan Phelan is a registered U.S.

article thumbnail

From Fruit to Fortune: Apple’s Trademark Journey and Their Fierce Protection Strategy

Intepat

This success is largely attributed to Apple’s effective trademarking of various designs and sounds related to its products and services. Notably, Apple trademarked its store design in the United States in 2011. has invested heavily in marketing and brand promotion, making its trademark well-known to consumers.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Intersection of Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law with respect to Cross Licensing Agreements

IIPRD

This has led to the introduction of intellectual property rights which are a set of exclusionary rights as it excludes the world from enjoying a set of rights arising out an invention or creation, except the inventor or creator. These laws establish the backbone of safeguarding all the rights accrued to various kinds of intellectual property.

article thumbnail

Making Chips Abroad and Infringing a U.S. Patent

Patently-O

The Broadcom chips and Apple phones are manufactured outside of the United States, although they are largely designed in the US, and the nerve centers of marketing and sales are also in the US. 2016) on remand from 579 U.S. Broadcom makes infringing chips and they are installed in Apple devices. ” Halo Elecs., Pulse Elecs.,

Patent 126
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs brief. ” Dawgs brief.

article thumbnail

Today’s Obviousness Key: Motivation to Combine

Patently-O

The court’s ruling emphasizes that the mere existence of prior art elements is not sufficient to render a claimed invention obvious; rather, there must be a clear reason or rationale for a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine those elements in the claimed manner. Assembly Guidance Systems, Inc. In KSR Int’l Co.

Art 58
article thumbnail

PTAB Captains Take Notice: Carefully Weigh Secondary Considerations

Patently-O

Obviousness analysis primarily focuses on comparing the claimed invention against the prior art and using that consideration to guess whether the gap would have been obvious to fill at the time of the invention. Even without a presumption, nexus can be shown by tying the evidence to the “unique characteristics of the claimed invention.”