Patently-O
MARCH 18, 2024
The Federal Circuit has issued an interesting nonprecedential order in In re VLSI Technology LLC , denying VLSI’s petition for a writ of mandamus that sought to reverse a district court order allowing Intel to amend its answer to assert a declaratory judgment counterclaim regarding a patent license defense.
SpicyIP
JUNE 22, 2022
The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) recently released an interesting report titled ‘Compulsory licensing for expensive medicines’. Ordinarily, patentees voluntarily decide whether or not and on what conditions to grant licenses to third parties. Failing which, a compulsory license can be issued. Natco Pharma Ltd.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 30, 2023
For a patentee filing for patent protection regarding an invention made in the United States, a license is required before filing any application for a patent in a foreign country. Failure to get a foreign filing license can lead to invalidation of subsequently granted patents (35 U.S.C. Custom Blinds & Components , 2016 U.S.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 27, 2023
Recording a license agreement concerning an EU trade mark is not mandatory but has several benefits (see the EUIPO’s trade mark Guidelines ): The license has effects vis-à-vis third parties ( Art. Background Brandavid Oy (‘Brandavid’) owned three EU trade marks, which it licensed exclusively to Oy Shaman Spirits Ltd.
SpicyIP
AUGUST 12, 2021
He has also blogged for us in the past and was the SpicyIP Fellow for 2016. Ensuring Access to TB drugs: Is Compulsory License the Way? The petitioners in the Meera Yadav case highlight that between January 2016-May 2020, 11427 patients have died of MDR-TB. Y Chandrachud (2020-21) and is a Rhodes Scholar (2018). image from here.
JD Supra Law
MAY 23, 2023
The Court found that the Andy Warhol Foundation violated photographer Lynn Goldsmith's copyright in her 1981 photograph of Prince when the Foundation licensed its silkscreen variation of the photo (dubbed "Orange Prince") to Condé Nast in 2016 for use in the magazine's tribute. By: Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
IP Watchdog
AUGUST 31, 2021
The case stems from HTC’s refusal of a 2016 licensing deal in which Ericsson proposed a rate of $2.50 per 4G device to license its standard essential patents for mobile devices. Although HTC had previously paid Ericsson about $2.50 per device in 2017, which was based on the “smallest salable patent-practicing unit.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
79 
Let's personalize your content