LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

(I am unaware of any reported comparison, but I did find the latter compared to a toilet flushing and have seen the former’s trademark suffer indignities at times too ). The object then is to hear out all sides, and offer some thoughts on the recent clamor around acoustic marks and the questions that they present.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

The TTABlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

91237315 (February 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a service mark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Would you have applied for registration?

Service Mark 76

Service Mark Advertising Advertising Registration 76

The TTABlog

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or service mark. A threshold question in evaluating the registrability of a trademark or service mark is whether the proposed mark meets the source indication requirement.

Service Mark 76

Service Mark Registration Artwork Business 76

The TTABlog

JANUARY 23, 2024

2022-1961 (Fed. The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) 2022), cert. At the request of the USPTO under Fed. The TMEP is not the law - ed. ]. 4th 1328, 1331 (Fed.

Designs 62

Designs Design Registration Service Mark 62

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 11, 2022

There are three distinct trademark symbols you may use is the registered trademark symbol “R” (®) , the small “ TM” ( ) symbol , and the “SM” (℠) symbol. Overview: Which Trademark Symbol Should I Use? Put the ® to the upper right of your trademark. What Are Trademarks?

Trademark 52

Trademark Registering Trademarks Registration Copying 52

The TTABlog

MARCH 27, 2024

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark WE’RE HERE TO HELP WITH YOUR LEGAL NEEDS! finding that the phrase fails to function as a service mark for "legal services." 4th 1348, 2022 USPQ2d 115, at *3 (Fed. And so, the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Trademark Act.

Service Mark 54

Service Mark Registration Trademark Designs 54

The TTABlog

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

2022-1961 (Fed. The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) 2022), cert. In re GO & Associates, LLC , Appeal No. 14, 2023) [not precedential]. 4th 1328, 1331 (Fed.

Registration 70

Registration Service Mark Trademark Trademark Law 70

The TTABlog

AUGUST 29, 2022

Erik Brunetti, famous in the trademark world for knocking the scandalous and immoral provision of Section 2(a) out of the Lanham Act [ TTABlogged here ], returned to the TTAB in this battle over the proposed mark F**K for phone cases, jewelry, bags, and retail store services, in four separate applications. are not registrable."

Registration 52

Registration Service Mark Trademark Government 52

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 8, 2022

2, 2022, the Federal Circuit decided In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd. , an appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (Board) affirmance of the refusal to register a stylized version of the term.SUCKS. The examining attorney and the Board refused registration of both versions for failure to function as a mark.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Designs Design 52

The TTABlog

NOVEMBER 14, 2022

In re Pound Law, LLC , 2022 USPQ2d 1062 (TTAB 2022) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. The Board observed that, as made clear by the Trademark Act, the USPTO "is statutorily constrained to register matter on the Principal Register if and only if it functions as a mark." In re Brunetti , 2022 USPQ3d 764, at *9.

Law 52

Law Service Mark Registration Trademark 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 8, 2022

2, 2022, the Federal Circuit decided In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd. , an appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (Board) affirmance of the refusal to register a stylized version of the term.SUCKS. The examining attorney and the Board refused registration of both versions for failure to function as a mark.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Designs Design 52

The TTABlog

SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

Petitioner JNF LLC was undoubtedly unhappy with the result of its petition to cancel a registration for the mark HAPPIEST HOUR for bar and restaurant services. JNF claimed prior use of THE HAPPIEST HOUR for the identical services, but it failed to prove priority. TMEP Section 903.06 (2022). Emphasis by the Board).

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Advertising Advertising 52

The TTABlog

AUGUST 26, 2022

The Board found that Applicant's specimen of use "does not reflect that consumers of Applicant's services will perceive [either mark] as trademarks indicating. television entertainment services." 87916944 and 879169481 (August 24, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. Welch 2022. Serial Nos.

Television 62

Television Designs Design Service Mark 62

43(B)log

OCTOBER 11, 2022

1:21-cv-10688-IT, 2022 WL 4626918 (D. 30, 2022) Plaintiff, d/b/a Logan Car Service, has offered limousine and transportation services primarily in the Greater Boston area since the 2000s and uses logancarservice.com to do so. The actionable alleged misrepresentation is that defendant performed the relevant services.

False Advertising 83

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Copying 83

The TTABlog

DECEMBER 31, 2021

35: TTAB Grants MIRAGE BRANDS Cancellation Petition Due To Likelihood of Reverse Confusion On Remand from the CAFC, TTAB Denies Petition for Cancellation of "NAKED" Registration for Condoms TTABlog Test: Three Recent Section 2(d) Inter Partes Cases - How Did They Come Out? [Yes] Precedential No. Lack of Bona Fide Intent: Precedential No.

Cinema 67

Cinema Registration Trademark Reporting 67

The TTABlog

APRIL 22, 2022

The Board ruled that the proposed mark "would be perceived by consumers as a widely used social and political message and therefore merely informational in nature, as opposed to a source indicator of Applicant's goods and services." 88944728 (April 20, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Welch 2022.

Social Media 52

Social Media Service Mark Trademark Registration 52