Remove cost-process-filing-trademark-application
article thumbnail

Winzo v Google- Missed Opportunity to Detail out Disparagement

SpicyIP

In this process, they sometime tend to promote their product at the cost of dishonouring or discrediting their competitor’s product. This results in common claims of ‘disparagement’ in trademark law. Previously, trademark cases have been entertained in situations where disclaimers/ warnings have been given along with products.

article thumbnail

Trademark Registration for MSME

Intepat

Additionally, trademark registrations for MSMEs are relatively cost-effective. It is a simple process that can be done online. Trademarks help your business to stand out from the crowd where there are so many look-alike products. Every trademark is unique. MSMEs can use the trademark as a source of advertisements.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Imputing Bad Faith in Trademark Infringement Disputes: Analysing DHC Nova v. Novya Judgement

SpicyIP

Image from here In the case of Sterling Agro Industries Limited vs ASR Trading Company , the Delhi High Court while dealing with a trademark infringement suit, imputed mala fide intention to ASR Trading’s (the Defendant) act of applying for a trademark registration. His previous posts can be accessed here.

article thumbnail

Understanding the Difference Between Actual Use (1(a)) and Intent to Use (1(b)) Trademark Applications

LexBlog IP

Understanding the Difference Between Actual Use (1(a)) and Intent to Use (1(b)) Trademark Applications by Kennington Groff What is the difference between a Section 1(a) actual use application and a Section 1(b) intent to use trademark registration application? Is one application better than the other?

article thumbnail

Using dominant competitor's part names/numbers for comparison isn't false advertising, TM infringement, or (c) infringement

43(B)log

15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It

article thumbnail

Analysing Trademark Infringement In Light Of Mcdonald’s V. Maccoffee

IP and Legal Filings

The process for registering a trademark in India begins with the filing of an application with the Intellectual Property India (IPI), the national trademark office. Once the application is filed, it will be examined by the IPI to ensure that it meets the requirements for registration.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 4-March 10)

SpicyIP

A Case of Reverse Passing Off: DHC Rules In Favour Of Western Digital On Trademark Infringement Recently, the DHC passed an ex-parte interim injunction order against Geonix, holding them prima facie liable for indulging in ‘reverse passing off’ by selling Western Digital’s hard disks as their own.