Remove companies the-florida-bar
article thumbnail

Fla. Judge Bars Colo. Couple From Timeshare Exit Industry

IP Law 360

A Colorado couple was permanently barred from working in the timeshare exit company industry after a Florida federal judge granted an injunction to resolve a three-year-old lawsuit alleging their business falsely claimed it can help people legally cancel their timeshare contracts.

article thumbnail

Venue (and Changing Venue) in Criminal Trade Secret Cases

Patently-O

StrikeLines is a small Pensacola, Florida business that collects and sells the coordinates of those artificial fishing reefs. Of some importance for this case, although Pensicola is in the Northern District of Florida, StrikeLines keeps its data on servers located in Orlando. Orlando is in the Middle District of Florida.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

They filed a trademark lawsuit in 2018 but abandoned the suit when it got sent to arbitration. However, they didn’t give up! The Edible team had the brilliant idea of suing Google for “theft of personal property” and “conversion,” where the stolen/converted asset was the trademark. They could not. Conversion.

IP 126
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Decide Damages Period Under Copyright Act

LexBlog IP

Musician Sherman Nealy and his company, Music Specialist Inc. collectively, “Nealy”), sued Warner Chappell Music, Inc. (“Warner”), for copyright infringement in the Southern District of Florida, alleging that Warner was using Nealy’s musical works based on invalid third-party licenses in violation of 17 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company. Since 2014, they have sold a total of 7 units of apparel (5 of which were bought by the CEO’s friends). I’ll concentrate on the initial interest confusion claim.

article thumbnail

Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. Peninsula

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This is a case involving a trademark owner and a competitive keyword advertiser. The trademark owner memorably (and ridiculously) characterized the rival as engaging in “keyword conquesting,” a term I encourage you never to use. The court already sent that trademark claim to the jury ( my blog post on that ruling ).

article thumbnail

Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. Groupon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The record may likewise show that consumers sometimes mistakenly seek to redeem vouchers for other skydiving companies with LVSA… as a matter of law, a reasonably prudent consumer in this marketplace is unlikely to be confused as to the origin of the service offered. It has never offered its services through Groupon. Purchaser Care.