article thumbnail

copying competitor's website & reviews creates (c), TM, false advertising problems

43(B)log

It also allegedly resumed promoting and advertising the domain name “logan-car-service.com” and re-routing visitors to its own website. The court refused to dismiss copyright claims (plaintiff amended its complaint when it had registered its copyright, which was timely and ok).

article thumbnail

seller's online arbitrage exposes it to (c) and false advertising claims

43(B)log

This is easier when there’s a potential copyright claim (which is not subject to §113(c), which very few people remember). She publishes photos of her products on eBay, and has registered some copyrights in the photos. This alleged chutzpah triggered the false advertising element of the case. “[T]he

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed

43(B)log

It has trademark registrations for the word mark “NEO4J.” Doing so removed certain legal notices identifying Neo4j Sweden as the copyright holder and licensor, and removed the Commons Clause, effectively allowing Defendants to commercially use and support ONgDB.” Summary judgment granted on state and federal false advertising claims.

article thumbnail

Trademark Considerations for Copyrighted Works in the Public Domain

LexBlog IP

In the United States, an original work of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression (meaning the work can be communicated in a visual or audio form) is a protectable copyright. Because copyright protection has a set term, copyrights in certain works necessarily expire each year and enter the public domain.

article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

False advertising, Lei defendants: The complaint didn’t explain how “designed in the United States but … manufactured in China” was materially deceptive and thus didn’t meet FRCP 9(b) pleading standards. Since the designs were not plainly dissimilar, infringement was plausible. Motion to dismiss granted.

article thumbnail

Tiktok's other, smaller legal problem

43(B)log

23, 2024) Skipping the copyright and trade secrets part of the case. (In The court found aspects of the copyright/§1202 claims claim insufficiently specifically pled and granted leave to amend, including to add sufficient detail to establish that the works at issue were not US works and thus exempt from the pre-suit registration requirement.

article thumbnail

using competitor's images in comparative advertising is fair use even when appearance isn't being compared

43(B)log

24, 2023) “This case arises out of alleged misuse of copyrighted images, eventually leading to a dispute … that resulted in false business reviews, malicious e-mails, and mutual efforts to interfere with each other’s business.” The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other.