article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights for Social Media Influencers

IIPRD

A Social Media Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple social media platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on social media is through copyright. Make intangible assets.

article thumbnail

YouTube videos aren't commercial advertising/promotion even if some commercial info is in channel bio

43(B)log

29, 2023) “This action arises out of a series of interviews published on YouTube and conducted by Cornelia that plaintiffs perceive as defamatory.” Cornelia also has a YouTube channel with approximately 150,000 subscribers, publishing videos on investing, business, and fitness that have received over 13.8 Wealthy, Inc. million views.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Drake and 21 Savage May Have More (Legal) Issues Than Vogue

IPilogue

Vogue’s publishers have sued rappers Drake and 21 Savage for unauthorized use of Vogue’s trademarks and false representations in marketing their newest album, “Her Loss”. Katie Graham is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.

article thumbnail

Text of Complaint in X Corp v. Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in CD Cal, regarding not-for-profit’s reports on Twitter disinformation policies

LexBlog IP

The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on social media. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on social media. Are the reports advertisements?

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Publisher/Speaker Claims. A couple of specifics: The false advertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falsely advertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.”

article thumbnail

State Farm’s Nod to Nostalgia Sparks Copyright Clash With Atari

Copyright Lately

Video game publisher Atari Interactive has launched a copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm, claiming that the insurer improperly appropriated artwork from Atari’s 1983 arcade game “Crystal Castles” for an advertising campaign as part of a “cynical plot” to resonate with fickle millennial and Gen Z consumers.

article thumbnail

Got a Selfie With a Celebrity? Think Twice Before Using It In Ads–50 Cent v. Kogan

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Kogan made a similar post to her account : MedSpa and Kogan published the photo other times as well. If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s false advertising and possibly defamation. When is a video showing content published on social media an advertisement, and when it is a documentary?