LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 24, 2023

In a recent post , we discussed whether patent applications could provide insight into the blueprints of extraterrestrial spacecraft. Yet, an enigmatic question looms large: would the powers that be genuinely consider patenting such advanced technology, fully aware that patent applications might see the light of day?

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Invention Inventor Patent Prosecution 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 12, 2023

In a recent post , we discussed whether patent applications could provide insight into the blueprints of extraterrestrial spacecraft. Yet, an enigmatic question looms large: would the powers that be genuinely consider patenting such advanced technology, fully aware that patent applications might see the light of day?

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Invention Inventor Technology 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 23, 2022

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. She presently assists on over 400 patent prosecution matters, including managing deadlines, serving as a liaison with U.S. 201310567987.0 (the

Art 52

Art Patent Prosecution Patent Application Intellectual Property 52

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 7, 2021

With South Africa’s patent office having recently granted the first patent to an AI inventor, and an Australian court ruling in favor of AI inventorship, it’s time to review how we got here—and where we’re going. Further, the USPTO has issued thousands of inventions that utilize AI.

Inventor 142

Inventor Technology Patent Application Invention 142

IP Tech Blog

MARCH 15, 2022

Once commerce resumes between Russia and the affected countries, foreign owners of Russian patents should have documentation readily available to demonstrate such commercial activity in the hope that Russia authorizes retroactive compulsory licensing payments. underlining added).

Licensing 67

Licensing Patent Application Patent Prosecution Invention 67

Patent Trademark Blog

APRIL 14, 2022

A nonprovisional utility patent application has a roughly 90% probability of at least one rejection. A design patent application has an approximately 86% chance of approval. Basically, expect a utility patent application to be rejected at least once. How to respond to utility patent rejections.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Design Patent Art 52

SpicyIP

JULY 13, 2023

One of the other main concerns raised by IPQC members is that, currently, the patent examination seems to be more biased in the favour of granting patents regardless of the merit of a particular invention. – The patent system needs complete searches and substantive examination for functioning well.

Patent Application 95

Patent Application Invention Designs Design 95

SpicyIP

JULY 22, 2023

While there are a number of aspects covered by “Artificial Intelligence”, ranging from definitions to scope, from life-saving to life-threatening, there has been surprisingly limited public policy discussion on the intersection of AI and IP in India. Her area of interest lies in IP and corporate law. Arul Scaria).

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Reporting Government 98

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

Chinese Utility models can provide an alternative to invention patents and supplement them too. Unlike invention patents, utility models are not examined. Most people incorrectly assume these “junk” patents are worthless because they are granted without any substantial examination.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Patent Application Art 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 16, 2023

Controller of Patents and Designs ( pdf.), the Delhi High Court in very explicit terms called out the office of Controller of Patents and Designs for doing “little justice to the solemn functions” entrusted upon them with regards to their rejection order of Dolby’s patent application. In fact, at one point (para.

Invention 105

Invention Patent Application Patent Prosecution Patent 105

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Dear readers, as you may have noticed, after a bit of a slowdown, SpicyIP is once again picking up steam and we will be looking to bring you the spicy IP updates that you have been used to! Announcing Winners of 3 rd Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition on IP Law. Exploring the “Space” for Makeup Dupes in the Indian IP Framework”.

Patent Prosecution 111

Patent Prosecution Invention Journalism IP 111

IP Watchdog

APRIL 17, 2022

On April 13, 2022, the Federal Court of Australia, on appeal, reversed its 2021 decision that DABUS, an artificial intelligence (AI) machine, qualified as an inventor for a patent application under Australian law. Thaler has filed patent applications in several countries around the world for inventions created by DABUS.

Inventor 130

Inventor Patent Application Invention Patent 130

Kashishipr

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

It may so happen that the patent holder makes a misleading or misrepresenting or false disclosure of information, which is material to the invention. Hence, inequitable conduct may occur, for example, if one bribes researchers to lie as to the original date of the invention. It is a breach of the duty of candor.

Patent Application 105

Patent Application Invention Patent Inventor 105

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 30, 2023

Further, anyone holding rights in the invention must also qualify as a small entity. In general, an applicant qualifies as a micro entity under 37 CFR § 1.29 In general, an applicant qualifies as a micro entity under 37 CFR § 1.29

Business 98

Business Inventor Patent Licensing 98

The IP Law Blog

JULY 15, 2021

Step 2: If the claims are directed to an abstract idea, then the court determines whether the claims include elements showing an inventive concept that transforms the idea into a patent-eligible invention. Patent attorneys and inventors are often left to guess whether a particular invention is patent-eligible.

Law 109

Law Patent Invention Intellectual Property 109

SpicyIP

JULY 31, 2023

The present case is perhaps the first where the court deconstructs the question of patentability and infringement of product-by-process patent claims in India. But first, just to take a step back: What is a Product-by-Process Patent Claim?

Patent 98

Patent Invention Patent Prosecution Inventor 98

SpicyIP

APRIL 7, 2024

Significantly, the agreement requires India to make substantive changes to its provision obligating a patent applicant to furnish information about their foreign applications corresponding to their application in India. She has been working in the field of access to medicines, patents and IP for more than a decade.

Patent 72

Patent Patent Application Intellectual Property Law 72

LexBlog IP

MARCH 15, 2022

Once commerce resumes between Russia and the affected countries, foreign owners of Russian patents should have documentation readily available to demonstrate such commercial activity in the hope that Russia authorizes retroactive compulsory licensing payments. ” (underlining added).

Licensing 52

Licensing Patent Application Patent Prosecution Invention 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 25, 2022

And Does it Apply to Stakeholders of a Patent Lifecycle. Patents are composed of several different parts, each of which serves a particular purpose in securing the rights of an invention. Each component can provide information to the various stakeholders in the life of a patent.

Patent 52

Patent Inventor Invention Patent Application 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) conducted a live meeting for its Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Emerging Technologies (ET) Partnership Series. Part One – Helpful Tips for Prosecuting Patents in the Biotechnology Space.

Technology 52

Technology Trademark Patent Prosecution Patent 52

Patent Trademark Blog

AUGUST 11, 2021

A typical utility nonprovisional patent application will receive at least one Office Action rejecting the claims. Amendments are, therefore, common and to be expected in the normal course of patent prosecution. Less is more when it comes to claiming your invention, especially in the independent claims.

Patent Application 66

Patent Application Art Patent Prosecution Patent 66

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 16, 2021

Here, I define ‘rate of acceptance’ as the proportion of examined applications that go on to be accepted for grant. I was not one of those people, and I expect that neither were most other patent attorneys. In particular, expedited examination under the Global Patent Prosecution Highway (GPPH) program rose from just 2.7%

Patent Prosecution 52

Patent Prosecution Patent Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 9, 2022

continuation in part (“CIP”) Applications and Inventorship. In many cases, it may be desirable to file a new patent application that both relies on information disclosed in a previous patent application and includes new information that builds on the previous disclosure. Patent and Trademark Office.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent Prosecution 52

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

The winds of a busy Belgian court term blows through the IPKat's wild ancestor's mane (c) Christopher Stothers 'Tis the season for a look at the cases that were in 2021 from around Europe and what they mean for the IP litigation themes in those jurisdictions now that the dust has settled in 2022. The decisions we (arbitrarily!)

Litigation 82

Litigation Law Patent Invention 82

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

DECEMBER 2, 2020

As with any growing industry, cannabis stakeholders are eager to protect their valuable intellectual property (IP) rights, but their ability to obtain comprehensive IP protection and enforce their IP rights is sometimes in conflict with federal drug law. Patent Prosecution. FDA Regulation.

IP 52

IP Registration Trademark Branding 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 30, 2023

Further, anyone holding rights in the invention must also qualify as a small entity. In general, an applicant qualifies as a micro entity under 37 CFR § 1.29 In general, an applicant qualifies as a micro entity under 37 CFR § 1.29 had a gross income. had a gross income.

Business 52

Business Inventor Patent Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 15, 2021

Step 2: If the claims are directed to an abstract idea, then the court determines whether the claims include elements showing an inventive concept that transforms the idea into a patent-eligible invention. Patent attorneys and inventors are often left to guess whether a particular invention is patent-eligible.

Law 52

Law Invention Patent Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 5, 2023

Recent Case Law: Divisional Applications and ST.26 26 Standards The Korean Supreme Court’s recent clarification regarding the grace period for divisional applications is a significant development for patent holders in Korea. Additionally, KIPO’s adoption of the WIPO ST.26

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Intellectual Property Patent 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 23, 2022

Patent applicants fall under a variety of statuses that are determined by their relationship to other entities, the number of patents they own, and the type of patents they own. The fee schedule for patent applications and maintenance is based on the size of the entity filing the application.

Higher Education 52

Higher Education Patent Inventor Patent Application 52

Patent Trademark Blog

AUGUST 13, 2021

This is significantly earlier than the 16-month average wait time for a first Office Action in a typical US utility nonprovisional patent application. Though claim amendments are optional, you should take advantage of the opportunity to amend your PCT applications in light of the prior art found in the search report.

Art 74

Art Reporting Patent Prosecution Patent Application 74

The IPKat

DECEMBER 7, 2021

A decade ago, patent trolls were all the rage in the patent world. Whether in speeches, conferences, or articles, no subject engendered more IP conversation. If there was a rock-star matter in the patent world, it was the debate over trolls. Start with the sheer volume of patent applications.

Patent Troll 122

Patent Troll Patent Litigation Inventor 122

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

Ask the inventor to explicitly describe why the invention is more than the expected sum of its parts. Clients often ask how much detail they need to provide when working with an attorney to draft a patent application for an invention that includes software. Third, the Court discussed Solutran, Inc. Elavon, Inc., [6]

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Technology 52

Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2023

Will arguments be necessary in your utility patent application? Nine out of ten utility patent applications will get rejected at least once. So, yes, arguments will be required in the vast majority of utility patent applications. Trademark examiners are lawyers , and patent examiners are not.

Patent Application 98

Patent Application Patent Art Invention 98

LexBlog IP

JUNE 29, 2022

The RCE is required to continue examination of the patent application after the third Examiner’s Report and every second Examiner’s report following. •File divisional applications requiring a request for examination. •Add additional claims to trigger unity of invention. John DeStefano.

Patent 52

Patent Intellectual Property Patent Prosecution Reporting 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 17, 2023

He is interested in IP law, and commercial and criminal litigation. From conflicting positions on AI as a co-author of a work to the contours of information required u/s 39 about the patent applications filed abroad, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. Relying on the decision in Dominos Ip Holder LLC & Anr.

IP 59

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 59

LexBlog IP

MARCH 18, 2022

On February 28, 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“ PTAB ”) issued a decision on priority in an interference proceeding between the Broad Institute, Inc. Patent Application No. The inventors listed on Broad’s patent are Feng Zhang, Ph.D., The Broad Institute, Inc. Interference No. 15/981,807.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Editing Patent 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 18, 2023

From the text it appears that the HNLU team relied on an underlying ‘study’ conducted by a renowned IP law firm. Neither HNLU nor the IP law firm has made the raw data available to the public nor have they clarified the basis of selecting or excluding the data that they have used for their ’study’.

Patent Application 141

Patent Application Reporting Public Domain Patent 141