article thumbnail

Why Moral Rights are Dead Serious: Preserving the Posthumous Moral Right of Integrity – Part II

SpicyIP

Can legal representatives substitute their own judgement in the vindication of the author’s moral right? Could moral rights, a principally unassignable right, be inherited by successive generations of legal representatives of the author?

article thumbnail

Why Moral Rights are Dead Serious: Preserving the Posthumous Moral Right of Integrity – Part I

SpicyIP

Such treatment usually amounts to violations of the moral rights of the author. In this post, I shall examine the concept of the moral right of integrity and its potential as a tool in protecting the works of authors posthumously. The integrity right can be exercised by legal representatives of the author as well.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A musical box infringes author’s moral rights, says the French Cassation Court

The IPKat

In recent years, they also became the protagonist in a protracted litigation that reached the French Cassation Court. During his lifetime, Trenet assigned his economic rights to these songs to his music publisher, Editions Raoul Breton. He claimed the infringement of Trenet’s moral rights, namely the integrity right in the work.

article thumbnail

St. Art Foundation v. Acko General Insurance: Decoding Street Art, Fair use and Moral rights

SpicyIP

52(1)(t) and ‘moral rights’ of the author in such work. Lastly, I will discuss the argument of moral rights of the author in contending the ‘fair use exemption’ of their work. As a corollary, it also asserted ‘moral rights’ over the mural under Sec. 514, ‘The moral right of the Author’ ).

article thumbnail

When is an artist entitled to refuse attribution of an artwork? Italian Supreme Court provides (final) guidance in long-running dispute over Jeff Koons’s The Serpents

The IPKat

As IPKat readers are surely aware, his fame extends well beyond the art world, given that Koons has contributed as litigant to some of the most interesting copyright case law around the world [see, eg, IPKat coverage here ]. Background In 1988, the artefact at issue in the Italian litigation was shown at an exhibition in Cologne (Germany).

Artwork 94
article thumbnail

Adele, Spotify and the right of integrity

The IPKat

Also, is there a connection between this story and a possible infringement of the author's moral rights? Is the album per se, conceived as a particular sequence of songs, a work that is the result of the author's "free and creative choices" and thus deserving of the protection of the moral right of integrity?

article thumbnail

Book review: Performing Copyright: Law, Theatre and Authorship

The IPKat

And who poses moral rights in the work? As such, the research demonstrates that litigation is rare in this context, and whilst the participants held varying opinions on the rights and wrongs of coping, there appears to be a normative regulation within theatre, where a wide degree of copying is tolerated.