article thumbnail

3 Key Takeaways - Ethics Issues in Patent Prosecution

JD Supra Law

Kilpatrick Townsend partner Charles Gray recently co-presented on the topic of “Ethics Issues in Patent Prosecution” at the firm’s annual three-day “Ski-LE” in Colorado. Three key takeaways from the discussion concerning “Ethics Issues in Patent Prosecution” include. By: Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

article thumbnail

5 KEY TAKEAWAYS: Ethics in Patent Prosecution

JD Supra Law

Saab recently presented “Ethics in Patent Prosecution” at the firm’s three-day CLE & Ski Series, KT Intellectual Property Seminar (KTIPS), in Colorado. 5 key takeaways from the presentation, include. Kilpatrick Townsend partners Gene Bernard and Karam J. Please see full article below for more information.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Glaring Procedural Questions Arising Out of a Recent Patent Prosecution Proceeding  

SpicyIP

Discussing the background of the case in this guest post, Suriya Balakanthan, highlights how these procedural lapses took place and highlights the impact that this case can have on the patent prosecution setup. Suriya is a Patent Analyst from Salem Tamil Nadu. The views expressed at those of the author’s alone.

article thumbnail

The Times They Are a-Changin’? A Look at the Revised Patent Prosecution Timelines in the Draft Patent Amendment Rules

SpicyIP

A Look at the Revised Patent Prosecution Timelines in the Draft Patent Amendment Rules Md. Sabeeh Ahmad The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce has released the Draft Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2023 (“Draft Rules”) suggesting some key changes in the Patent Rules, 2003 (“2003 Rules”).

article thumbnail

UMKC School of Law Wins National Patent Application Drafting Competition

Patently-O

I am sure a great deal of the credit for their success can be attributed to our adjunct faculty members teaching patent prosecution at UMKC, James Devaney (Shook Hardy & Bacon) and Jon Hines (Senior Patent Counsel at 3Shape). The final round of the competition was in-person and took place at PTO headquarters.

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Septembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

One pertinent post on this subject was from this month in 2010 called the Patent Eligibility and the Logic of Law and Science. Basheer endorsed the point about testing patent agents on foundational legal subjects since a good part of patent prosecution will involve “legal” aspects, without requiring them to have a law degree to take the exam.

article thumbnail

Patentee doublethink in regulatory submissions and patent prosecution is inequitable conduct: Belcher v. Hospira (US)

The IPKat

Inequitable conduct includes, for example, intentionally failing to disclose information to the USPTO that is material to the patentability of an application (see also Sanofi-Aventis v Hospira , IPKat ). The solution provided by the patent was a L-adrenaline formulation having a high pH (2.8-3.3).