topics cars-rule 
The IPKat
MARCH 9, 2023
A Kat in an hotel room Trade marks Giorgio Luceri examined the judgments in T-568/21 and T-569/21 issued by the General Court, on 1 February 2023, relating to two trade mark oppositions filed by Google against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR".
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
In the Commission’s proposal , the so-called Repair Clause is the hottest topic. The new rules will, in the words of the Commission, ‘help to open up and increase competition in the spare parts market, allowing consumers more choice in repairing complex products such as cars in particular.’
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
JANUARY 25, 2022
3D trade marks are always a topic of interest, with some proprietors despairing as to whether trade mark law will provide them with any practical protection. Class 12: Camping cars; Mobile homes [caravans]; Camper vans; Camping vehicles. The recent decision of the EUIPO’s Board of Appeal may provide some comfort.
TorrentFreak
MARCH 10, 2023
Softer, More Cooperative Tone There is no such thing as a friendly anti-piracy report, the topic immediately rules that out, but the language and tone in the Industry Trust’s publication is interestingly close. Our initial article focused on just one item in the report but something much more fundamental ran throughout.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
The recently issued conclusion (of 8 October 2021) by the Attorney General to the Dutch Supreme Court is worth discussing, as it gives an insightful analysis of a difficult topic: what are the limits to parody? In the commercial Verstappen delivers groceries in his F1 racing car, attesting to the swiftness of Jumbo’s delivery service.
LexBlog IP
JULY 28, 2022
On 3 March 2022, the EPO published a notice to remind users of certain rules that may help Ukrainian companies based in areas directly or indirectly affected by military activities. The EPO also recalled Rule 82c( 1) and Article 26bis(3) of the PCT, which allow for the extension of time limits in similar circumstances.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
But in the precedential ruling In re Lizzo LLC , the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) reversed the refusal, finding that consumers encountering 100% THAT B H in connection with clothing would associate the phrase with Lizzo and her music. A fulsome discussion about this topic can be found here: [link].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
67 
Let's personalize your content