Remove topics contract-interpretation
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Generative AI, originality, and the potential role of contract in protecting unoriginal works

The IPKat

Here’s what they write: Generative AI, originality, and the potential role of contract in protecting unoriginal works by Adrian Aronsson-Storrier and Oliver Fairhurst Artificial Kat Over the past two years the IPKat has hosted debate on the question of whether the outputs of generative AI tools are protected under copyright law.

article thumbnail

Addressing Common Reuse Questions in Medical Communications

Velocity of Content

If you then want to reuse the content in another way, the details of the reuse scenario change and therefore could impact the publisher’s licensing and pricing decisions. Rebecca Cook, Wiley: When it comes to licenses and permissions, the reuse rights you’ve secured are a matter of contract law. “If

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Musical Chairs and Corporate Love Triangles

Patently-O

Later, those two companies formed an official partnership to develop a C3-binding protein (the same topic for which Amyndas had shared data). Zealand’s patent applications also published relating to the same topic. At the time of contracting, Zealand Pharma had not yet been restructured to also form Zealand US.

Music 56
article thumbnail

“Private” Facebook Groups Aren’t Legally “Private”–Davis v. HDR

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiff pointed out that HDR gained access to the group on a false pretense (claiming to be interested in the topic, when really it was just a data snarfer). Breach of contract, perhaps? But that would only be enforceable by users in contract privity). ” Intrusion Into Seclusion.

Privacy 135
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

Thus, contrary to the recent Nature article on this topic, AI is not breaking patent law. The Board of Appeal concluded that they were convinced that there is not a problem of unequal treatment for computer assisted inventions calling for an evolutive interpretation of European patent law.

article thumbnail

DSA: Commission issues guidance on the requirement to publish user numbers in the EU

LexBlog IP

While the guidance is not ground breaking, it provides a helpful interpretation of certain provision of the DSA. Providers of hybrid online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders (i.e.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement

The IPKat

Emphasis added) In addition, the SPC provides judicial guidance in the (PD Interpretation). The intentional repeated infringement falls under ‘Other situations where the circumstances may be found to be serious’ as stipulated in Article 4 of the PD Interpretation. 1)-(6) of the PD Interpretation. of the PD Interpretation.