Remove topics contract-terms
article thumbnail

Copyright Concerns When Using Others to Create Content

Erik K Pelton

One is the contract with the individual or individuals doing the work who help create content; and two is the type of content that they create and where they get photos from, in particular. First, contracts. Make sure you have proper contracts. And then you can use them subject to their terms, which will generally be okay.

article thumbnail

Contractual Control over Information Goods after ML Genius v. Google (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. The flexibility of contracts makes them a prime candidate for restricting uses that copyright law leaves unprohibited. That still leaves a rather broad space for contract law to effectively limit the use of information.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Peloton Can’t Bind All Family Members To Its Arbitration Provision–SS v. Peloton

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Stern cannot reasonably dispute agreeing to Peloton’s Terms of Service. It’s a reminder that you must consider how you will introduce evidence of contract formation in addition to worrying about the contract terms and formation process. The court discusses another topic I don’t often see discussed.

Contracts 115
article thumbnail

Copyright Law Preempting Contractual Terms of Use

Patently-O

Contract not Copyright: Genius does not hold the copyright to the lyrics and so has no copyright infringement claim. The complaint asserts breach of contract based upon violation of its terms of service; unfair competition (based upon state law); and unjust enrichment. LyricFind scraped the data and then sold it to Google.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Generative AI, originality, and the potential role of contract in protecting unoriginal works

The IPKat

Here’s what they write: Generative AI, originality, and the potential role of contract in protecting unoriginal works by Adrian Aronsson-Storrier and Oliver Fairhurst Artificial Kat Over the past two years the IPKat has hosted debate on the question of whether the outputs of generative AI tools are protected under copyright law.

article thumbnail

Dropbox’s TOS Amendment Fails (And If This Opinion Stands, Yours Will Too)–Sifuentes v. Dropbox

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Given how rarely TOS amendments use clickthroughs, this opinion could anticipate the widespread failure of TOS amendments if it’s the final word on the topic. The email also included multiple bullet points describing changes being made to the TOS, including: We’re adding an arbitration section to our updated Terms of Service.

Contracts 107
article thumbnail

EPO doubles down on opposition acceleration commitment

The IPKat

The perennial topic of anguish, anger, anxiety, annoyance, etc amongst patent attorneys and litigators, alike. So, very similar to the national courts of most EPC contracting states. Accelerated EPO oppositions. With the Unified Patent Court (UPC), a new dimension arrives. Cue, Kat Friend, Sir Robin Jacob ( UCL ).

Contracts 113