Remove topics dogs
article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision

The IP Law Blog

The holding in the Supreme Court case, Jack Daniels Properties v VIP Products , the case of the infringing Bad Spaniels dog toy, limits the applicability of the Rogers test. The dispute involved a claim by Jack Daniel’s that a dog toy infringed a number of its trademarks. A recent case in the Ninth Circuit, Punchbowl Inc v.

article thumbnail

Thursday Thingies

The IPKat

Despite being a GuestKat, Alessandro is actually more of a dog person in real life (don ’ t tell Merpel!) and somewhat of a sausage-dog enthusiast. More information about Alessandro can be found here. NFTs, AI, VR and innovative revenues models) and emerging issues of data governance from a property/IP perspective.

IP 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision

LexBlog IP

The holding in the Supreme Court case, Jack Daniels Properties v VIP Products , the case of the infringing Bad Spaniels dog toy, limits the applicability of the Rogers test. The dispute involved a claim by Jack Daniel’s that a dog toy infringed a number of its trademarks. A recent case in the Ninth Circuit, Punchbowl Inc v.

article thumbnail

Training AI models on Synthetic Data: No silver bullet for IP infringement risk in the context of training AI systems (Part 4 of 4)

LexBlog IP

What other key legal topics should I consider when using synthetic data to train an AI model? These topics are not covered in this series in further detail, but it is worth noting at least that the use of synthetic data can also mitigate certain specific risks under applicable data protection and privacy laws.

IP 52
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

The IPKat

Katfriend Alessandro Cerri covered the topic of whiskey and dog toys by delivering an article on the recent SCOTUS decision on First Amendment protection for expressive works.

Copying 52
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Whiskey and dog toys: SCOTUS decision on First Amendment protection for expressive works

The IPKat

The Rogers test has primarily been applied by the courts in situations where a mark is used to perform some form of expressive function rather than designate a work’s source – a topical example being the lawsuit brought by Mattel in the early 2000s in relation to the song Barbie Girl. 7 Brand Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” as “The Old No.

article thumbnail

AI & IP: A Not-so-Perfect Pairing

LexBlog IP

In the intellectual property sphere, one of the hottest topics surrounding the use of these AI tools is whether the works of art or inventions (including works of industrial design) created using these tools can still be considered the creation of the individual author or designer. copyright law.

IP 52