Remove topics functional-claim-language
article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. The claims are directed to a method of determining a user’s location with a GPS and displaying images the user based on their location. was correct.

Invention 130
article thumbnail

Construing the claims to include technical effects mentioned in the description (T 1924/20)

The IPKat

Claim interpretation is the current hot-topic at the EPO , specifically the extent to which the description should be taken into account in claim interpretation. T he EPO has recently taken a hard line against using the description to narrow the meaning of clear language in the claims.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The IPKat EPO Boards of Appeal Year in Review 2023

The IPKat

G2/21 and the mysteries of plausibility The topic that this Kat has spent the most electronic ink on this year is undoubtedly G 2/21. After a flurry of decisions at the start of the year , the Boards of Appeal have gone rather silent on the topic of ViCo oral proceedings. This is one to watch for 2024. Will this be G1/24?

Invention 110
article thumbnail

USPTO Appeals Panel to Clarify Antibody Claiming in MPF & Jepson Format

LexBlog IP

Post-Amgen Claiming Techniques in Focus Last year’s landmark decision in Amgen V. Sanofi emphasized that “the more a party claims, the broader the monopoly it demands, the more it must enable.” The USPTO is now committed to providing clarity on these topics in In re Xencor.

article thumbnail

Around the IP Blogs

The IPKat

In this series, the blog's authors offer answers to 21 topical copyright questions for the 21st century. It reviews the basic issues on the topic, then elaborates on the importance of performers’ rights for creative industries and the main debates and developments in the area. Last week’s post is dedicated to performers’ rights.

article thumbnail

Cloned-and-Revised Legal Documents Aren’t Copyrightable–UIRC v. William Blair

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This case revisits the venerable topic of if, and when, cloning-and-revising a legal document can be copyright infringement. Despite UIRC’s copyright registrations, the court says the UIRC’s edits aren’t copyrightable: UIRC did not independently create most of the language in the documents at issue.

article thumbnail

Examining the Specification

Patently-O

Thus we get: New Matter Written Description : Any amendments made to the claims during prosecution must be supported by the originally filed specification. In particular, the original specification must show ‘possession’ of the newly claimed invention. I would love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

Inventor 104