The IPKat

APRIL 10, 2024

The Court's judgment hinged on a literal interpretation of the legal framework. Literal interpretation of the Regulation: The court adhered to a strict interpretation of Regulation 8(2)(a) and (c), emphasizing the clear and unambiguous wording that grants access to "basic information" without a court order.

Privacy 57

Privacy Law Government Confidentiality 57

Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2022

In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. In my mind, it was always clear that the Federal Circuit would refuse Thaler’s petition, but it remains a fascinating topic in my mind. 35 U.S.C. § 100(f) (2022). ” Slip Op.

Invention 99

Invention Inventor Patent Law Patent 99

The IPKat

DECEMBER 14, 2022

The IPKat and its contributors have received awards for their reporting on, interpreting of, and helping shape IP laws in several different jurisdictions. According to the Justia rankings , The IPKat is the most popular IP blog of all time.

Blogging 80

Blogging Editing IP Publishing 80

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

While the heatwave is leaving the UK , here is the recap of the topics considered in case you missed the IPKat. Patents Rose Hughes discussed the recent High Court decision (Newron v Comptroller [2023] EWHC 1471) in relation to the interpretation of the phrasing “the product” and its meaning within the SPC Regulation.

Invention 62

Invention Intellectual Property Reporting Litigation 62

The IPKat

MARCH 21, 2024

The UPC CoA interpreted the claims of the patent more broadly than the Local Division and found the patent likely to be invalid for lack of inventive step. UPC CoA considers the correct approach to claim interpretation On appeal, the UPC CoA reassessed the first instance decision on the patent's validity.

Invention 57

Invention Art Patent Licensing 57

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 18, 2023

” As suggested by the title of the notice itself, the USPTO did not expand its interpretation of the subject matter eligibility of computer-generated electronic images under Section 171, but instead reiterated its current practice noting that “[t]his supplemental guidance does not change the current guidance [ i.e. , MPEP § 1504.01(a)(I)

Designs 40

Designs Design Design Patent Artistic Work 40

The IPKat

JANUARY 5, 2022

Interpreting the claims in view of the description Importantly, in order for the OD to reach the decision that the summary of the prior art added matter, it was necessary for the claims to be interpreted in light of the description, in view of Article 69 EPC. The patent was thus revoked in its entirety.

Art 113

Art Patent Application Patent Invention 113

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 30, 2021

narrowly interpreting the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act , 18 U.S.C. § And, because this show is for you , please email Ben , Russell or me with any topics you’d like to hear us discuss. Episode 10 of Fairly Competing is out! § 1030 — and what it means for protecting proprietary electronic materials.

Music 52

Music Intellectual Property 52

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

May 18, 2021) This would make a great student note topic: Is disparate impact “unfair” under state consumer protection laws? Conopco, Inc., 20-2696 (8 h Cir. The court here implicitly says no, without ever confronting the question directly. Seems wrong to me.

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising Marketing Marketing 59

Velocity of Content

APRIL 25, 2023

When in doubt, double-check, because each rightsholder will have a different interpretation.” For more information, check out the full recording of the panel discussion now to watch an in-depth discussion of the above myths and get answers to many common questions about reuse in medical communications.

Licensing 98

Licensing Copyright Publishing Contracts 98

The IPKat

OCTOBER 2, 2023

Therefore, while the interpretation of G 2/21 has so far predominantly been in Board of Appeal cases in the biotech field ( T 0873/21 , T 1394/21 , T 0116/18 ), G 2/21 also has relevance to any case for which a new technical effect, not mentioned in the application as filed, is relied on for inventive step.

Invention 70

Invention Art Publishing Patent 70

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

Emphasis added) In addition, the SPC provides judicial guidance in the (PD Interpretation). The intentional repeated infringement falls under ‘Other situations where the circumstances may be found to be serious’ as stipulated in Article 4 of the PD Interpretation. 1)-(6) of the PD Interpretation. of the PD Interpretation.

Settlement 70

Settlement Patent Infringement Patent Intellectual Property 70

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 16, 2023

Findings from the legal practice of the member states and considerations on interpretation in European law ". The event will focus on topics like digital platforms, investment in electronic communications infrastructures, Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Artificial Intelligence. More information can be found here.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Music IP Registration 67

The IPKat

MARCH 9, 2023

The case deals with the topic of whether the registration of slogans is allowed by EU trade mark law. This case underlines the challenging aspect of the interpretation of the requirements of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’. Giorgio Luceri gave IPKat readers some thoughts on the judgment in T-204/22 (Rimini Street, Inc.

Registration 67

Registration Inventor Designs Design 67

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

We would very much like to focus heavily on celebrating, but things just feel a bit too complicated this year – particularly when it comes to the hot topics of Pride Month, LGBTQ issues and corporate support of the LGBTQ community.

Marketing 52

Marketing Marketing Blogging Reporting 52

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Introducing explicit statements that certain subject matter does not fall under the scope of the invention could potentially impact interpretation of the claims under the doctrine of equivalents. Deleting subject matter removes the possibility of relying on that subject matter for post-grant amendments during opposition.

Invention 98

Invention Patent Application Patent Prosecution Patent 98

43(B)log

MARCH 25, 2024

The district court reasoned that Zauderer did not apply because the imagery was fundamentally so “prone to ambiguous interpretation” that “it is unclear how a court would go about determining whether it[ ]. Plus, these images were “meant to be interpreted literally.” The inherent ambiguity in any graphic warning—e.g.,

Advertising 64

Advertising Advertising Social Media Government 64

The IPKat

JULY 19, 2022

The stated aim of the workshop, which took place at the end of June, was to provide users with "clarity" on description amendments in view of some recent conflicting decisions on the topic from the Boards of Appeal. The EPO has now reported that the workshop of experts "confirmed" EPO practice on description amendments.

Patent Application 131

Patent Application Reporting Advertising Advertising 131

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

With fundamental issues of interpretation remaining pending before the CJEU – such as the meaning of “material” and “non-material” damage; and the imposition or otherwise of liability under Article 82 in the context of a hacking incident – the court used its inherent discretionary jurisdiction, to grant a stay.

Technology 52

Technology Intellectual Property 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 26, 2024

Well … ‘tis just a glimpse of the long-going discussion on the topic. State of Punjab where the Court interpreted the provisions narrowly. Similarly, Anjali detailedly discussed the Delhi High Court’s problematic interpretation of the provision in Ten Events and Entertainment v. Novex Communications Pvt.

Music 64

Music Copyright Copyright Infringement Blogging 64

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

That could be the case, in particular, where those marks are not reduced to an ordinary advertising message but possess a certain originality and require a minimum effort of interpretation or trigger a cognitive process in the relevant public. A company's attention must therefore be constant, and a compliance plan seems appropriate.

Trademark 132

Trademark Advertising Advertising Marketing 132

TorrentFreak

APRIL 7, 2023

However, until we achieve that, we will fight in courts over interpretation and enforcement of the law,” the operators said at the time. Do they even have an opinion on the topic this far into government? But a general principle stands regardless of the topic. The operators of movie download sites Tipnafilm.cz

Music 122

Music Government Copyright Infringement Copyright 122

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

The conference will be in English, simultaneous interpreting into French, German, Italian and Spanish will be provided. The lecture will consider the topic of Generative AI and Author Remuneration. Registration closes on 12 October 2023. It is possible to register and find more details here.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Management Editing IP 67

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2021

are written closely side by side without any interval symbol in between, the overall sign’s interpretations predictably varied (as shown in the table below). The first aspect was whether the sign’s extended meaning had an “adverse effect” and how broad the ambit of it could be: The extended interpretation should be reasonable.

Intellectual Property 62

Intellectual Property IP Law Registration 62

Herbert Smith Freehills

APRIL 12, 2022

Indeed, much had been written on the duty, but there was much more froth and fiction than fact or critical legal thinking on the topic. Indeed, Margaret propounded that the word ‘best’ in the ‘best interests’ duty was otiose. At that point, ‘jaws dropped’, and you could have heard a pin drop in the room!

Law 52

Law 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 19, 2024

For now, AI developers and copyright practitioners will have to wait for another decision, probably from a higher court, or a judicial interpretation from the Supreme People’s Court, for further authoritative guidance on this topic.

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Infringement Intellectual Property Copying 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

OCTOBER 12, 2022

Thus, “the disputed attribution nevertheless is not a statement of objective fact about Mr. Stossel or his reporting, but rather the reviewer’s subjective interpretation of the Fire Video’s contents.” ” This is yet another example of how linking to sources can turn the associated text into non-actionable opinion.

Litigation 132

Litigation Advertising Advertising Blogging 132

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023

In its original Proposal, the Commission tried to address the issues that arose with the interpretation of the notion of “ evocation ”, by providing a specific definition. The “in particular” part will surely open way for further preliminary rulings on the topic.

Art 131

Art Registration Journalism Intellectual Property 131

Velocity of Content

MAY 31, 2023

In early May, CCC hosted “ Workflow of the Future: Sustainable Business Models ,” the fifth event in a series designed to help facilitate important conversations on critical topics related to standards, including sustainability.

Business 98

Business Publishing Designs Design 98

The IPKat

APRIL 20, 2022

A Kat in desperate need of a coffee GuestKat Gabriele Girardello shared with us the trends and topics covered at the “Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation” conference in Amsterdam, which he attended on 14-16 March 2022. GuestKat Rose Hughes provided here insights with several KatFriends also offering their views on the matter.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Reporting Designs Design 67

The IPKat

AUGUST 28, 2021

Copyright PermaKat Eleonora Rosati shared her analysis of the judgment in VG Bild-Kunst (C-392/12), issued by the Court of Justice earlier this year [see also an earlier post by Eleonora on the same topic here ]. In this judgment, the Court has (once again) interpreted the concept of ‘communication to the public’ under the InfoSoc Directive.

Patent Troll 70

Patent Troll Inventor Marketing Marketing 70

43(B)log

AUGUST 10, 2021

NYIPLA strives to educate the public and members of the bar in this particular field and continually works with foreign associations to harmonize the substance and interpretation of international conventions for the protection of intellectual property. About the Award The Hon. William C.

Intellectual Property Law 72

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Privacy Law 72

Patently-O

JUNE 15, 2022

UMass’s claimed invention is a topical skin care product containing adenosine that is applied to the skin. Panel: Prost, Mayer, Taranto (author). This opinion nominally addressing indefiniteness illustrates the power of de novo claim construction review at the Federal Circuit. ” Slip Op.

Invention 78

Invention Inventor Blogging Patent 78

The IPKat

JULY 11, 2022

Thus, contrary to the recent Nature article on this topic, AI is not breaking patent law. The Board of Appeal concluded that they were convinced that there is not a problem of unequal treatment for computer assisted inventions calling for an evolutive interpretation of European patent law.

Patent Law 145

Patent Law Publishing Inventor Law 145

SpicyIP

JANUARY 17, 2022

Since the topic requires a full-fledged research paper with detailed arguments, the post only touches upon the constitutional and international law aspects to show that there is a strong logico-legal case worth investigating, for the R2R in India.) . The inclusion of data under material resources by the Srikrishna Committee (e.g.

Copyright Law 119

Copyright Law Copyright Law Art 119

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 10, 2022

The plaintiff pointed out that HDR gained access to the group on a false pretense (claiming to be interested in the topic, when really it was just a data snarfer). The ECPA requires the plaintiff to show that “her posts in the Groups were not readily accessible by the general public.” ” Intrusion Into Seclusion.

Privacy 134

Privacy False Advertising Contracts Advertising 134

The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2022

As readers of this blog will be familiar, divergent interpretations of the SPC regulations by national courts, coupled with sometimes less than crystal clear guidance from the CJEU, is a hallmark of the current SPC system ( IPKat ).

Registration 82

Registration Reporting Marketing Marketing 82