Copyright Smalls Claims Proceedings
Above the Fold
JANUARY 30, 2024
More information on these proceedings and their procedures is available on the Copyright Office’s website.
This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.
Above the Fold
JANUARY 30, 2024
More information on these proceedings and their procedures is available on the Copyright Office’s website.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 30, 2024
More information on these proceedings and their procedures is available on the Copyright Office’s website.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
MAY 5, 2022
Given ongoing interest in the topic, USPTO has engaged ACUS to conduct. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. patent court, including, as relevant, pleadings, discovery, and alternative.
Trading Secrets
OCTOBER 27, 2022
Joshua Salinas—Seyfarth associate and member of the firm’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes practice—is leading a discussion during the Lunch with Table Topics on Friday, November 4. His discussion will be focused on the latest trends in protecting trade secrets.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 27, 2022
Joshua Salinas—Seyfarth associate and member of the firm’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes practice—is leading a discussion during the Lunch with Table Topics on Friday, November 4. His discussion will be focused on the latest trends in protecting trade secrets.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 10, 2024
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Explore significant recent decisions, covering critical aspects such as damages, fees, misappropriation, and pleading standards, including state and Defend Trade Secrets Act decisions.
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 13, 2022
The IP blogs have been active over the past week bursting with a wide range of different topics. More questions and answers on this interesting topic have been discussed in detail by the Kluwer Copyright Blog here. The IPKat has once again compiled some of them for you. TRADE MARKS It's time to take a look at last year's statistics.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
NOVEMBER 20, 2022
For this reason, the undersigned agrees with the other district courts that have rejected CDA immunity for analogous services at the pleadings stage [cites to Kellman and Bonilla ]. Publicity Rights Claim. The Court agrees.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 17, 2022
The court gives the plaintiffs a chance to amend their complaint but says it’s “skeptical” they can plead a successful case here. Also see: Emojis and the Law , my flagship paper on the topic with a section on copyright protection for emojis. Emojis and Intellectual Property , a brief and breezy survey of the topic.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 10, 2024
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Explore significant recent decisions, covering critical aspects such as damages, fees, misappropriation, and pleading standards, including state and Defend Trade Secrets Act decisions.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 13, 2023
Seyfarth attorneys, Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, and Joshua Salinas will address the following topics: . Recent significant trade secret misappropriation decisions concerning damages, fees, and pleading. Plus, they will provide predictions for what to expect in 2023. The Defend Trade Secrets Act and tips for navigating the law.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
NOVEMBER 6, 2023
This opinion forces the court to address the boundaries of choreographic copyright, a lightly litigated topic. ” (Unfortunately, the court gratuitously added that “it is generally disfavored for copyright claims to be dismissed for lack of substantial similarity at the pleading stage.” Previous blog post.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 13, 2023
Seyfarth attorneys, Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, and Joshua Salinas will address the following topics: Significant new legislation for non-competes and other restrictive covenants and related court decisions that may affect their enforcement. Plus, they will provide predictions for what to expect in 2023.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 13, 2022
Seyfarth attorneys Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, and James Yu will address the following topics: Significant new legislation on non-compete and other restrictive covenants and related court decisions that may impact their enforcement. Recent significant trade secret misappropriation decisions concerning damages, fees, and pleading.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 13, 2022
Seyfarth attorneys Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, and James Yu will address the following topics: Significant new legislation on non-compete and other restrictive covenants and related court decisions that may impact their enforcement. Recent significant trade secret misappropriation decisions concerning damages, fees, and pleading.
TorrentFreak
JANUARY 15, 2024
After the miniseries was seen by millions earlier this month, private prosecutions – which allow alleged victims of crime to prosecute their own criminal cases – are now a topic of national debate. As a result, the government is under pressure to act against what some believe is an emerging two-tier justice system.
The IPKat
MAY 12, 2024
Over to the team : "Introduction: the UPC shapes its confidentiality regime Confidentiality can be a sensitive topic for parties involved in legal proceedings. When a request to make written pleadings and evidence available to a member of the public is made pursuant to R.262.1(b)
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 13, 2022
No well-pleaded facts suggest that Omegle had actual knowledge of the sex trafficking venture involving C.H. I will have more to say on this topic in a very lengthy FOSTA roundup blog post stuck in my queue. ” Publisher/Speaker Claims. or that Omegle had an active participation in the venture.” ” Cite to Doe v.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 17, 2023
While many of these lawsuits are in the initial stages of litigation, defendants are sure to assert “fair use” and constitutional defenses should plaintiffs’ claims survive pleadings. ” Id. at ¶ 10. ” Id. at ¶ 78.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Much like the case of Jolie, the sweaters quickly became a topic of controversy , as the Cowichan Tribes of Vancouver Island alleged the sweater designs had been appropriated from one of their traditional designs. R & T Textiles admitted they infringed Bulun Bulun’s work but pleaded ignorance and pulled the shirts from their shelves.
The IPKat
APRIL 25, 2024
Since we last wrote for the IPKat on the topic , additional posts have discussed the Science, Innovation and Technology Select Committee’s inquiry into the impact of AI on the creative industries and the UK House of Lords Inquiry into Large Language Models.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
The recently issued conclusion (of 8 October 2021) by the Attorney General to the Dutch Supreme Court is worth discussing, as it gives an insightful analysis of a difficult topic: what are the limits to parody? Background In 2016, Verstappen featured in a TV commercial for Dutch supermarket chain Jumbo.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 8, 2022
Finally, even if Hart had plausibly pleaded that the Federal Defendants exercised coercive power over the companies’ misinformation policies, he still fails to specifically allege that they coerced action as to him.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 21, 2023
Or perhaps there is no way for plaintiffs to plead discrimination without smoking-gun evidence of individual discriminatory decisions. That topic is expressly at issue in the FLA and TX social media censorship cases). I also question if the law can restrict publishers’ ability to discriminate in their editorial decisions.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 13, 2024
I agree with the court on this, but it seems inconsistent with some other recent opinions that found that a TTC claim had been properly pleaded, despite threadbare allegations. Twitter’s complaint contained no allegations of such impairment or deprivation, according to the court.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
APRIL 1, 2023
This ruling covers two key topics related to 512. This denial is sufficient to bar judgment on the pleadings on this cause of action. Because of these deficiencies, the court says: “The copyright note is not a DMCA notice under § 512. And without a DMCA notice, § 512(f) does not apply.” ” Cite to ISE v.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 9, 2022
Director Vidal highlights four different topics as they relate to the duty of disclosure standard: 1. .’’ Accordingly, this notice is meant to address the duty of disclosure and the duty of reasonable inquiry as it relates to the material submitted or received from other governmental agencies. Who Has a Duty to Disclose.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 15, 2022
And while we’re on the topic of an opinion covering multiple interesting trade secret issues, the U.S. Wrestling with what you need to plead to ensure that your DTSA claim satisfies the interstate commerce requirement? Diamond , which lays out the particulars required to satisfy that pleading requirement.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 11, 2021
FWIW, I raised this issue as a possible paper topic in 2008. Plaintiff’s claim is not preempted by the Copyright Act at this stage of the pleadings because his allegations qualitatively distinguish his IPRA claim from the rights protected by the Copyright Act. Copyright Preemption.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 12, 2023
Can a pleading citing “information and belief” for its allegations of misappropriation survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)? the Eighth Circuit joined six other federal circuits that found this form of pleading to be sufficient. § 256 was premature because no patents had yet issued. In Ahern Rentals, Inc.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
This is a topic I used as a sample exam idea in the 1990s). ” The court concludes “Plaintiffs have alleged enough likelihood of confusion to make it past the pleading stage.” There’s also a copyright claim for Luxy copying the plaintiff’s TOS/privacy policy. ” (How about this: let’s not).
SpicyIP
AUGUST 30, 2021
Topical Highlight. She suggests that the IPD Rules should provide for penalties for bad faith conduct of parties such as filing frivolous applications and pleadings which unnecessarily draw out the proceedings. Sun Pharma v. Cipla: Madras HC Rejects COVID as an Excuse for Passing Off. Cipla Ltd. ,
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
As in previous years, we have divided these developments into five categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgements/Orders (Topicality/Impact) b) Top 10 IP Judgements/Orders (Jurisprudence/Legal Lucidity) c) Top 10 IP Legislative and Policy Related Developments d) Other IP Developments; and e) Other Notable Developments. RDB and Co.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 18, 2022
Students: this post surfaces numerous potential paper topics. ” Finally, the complaint pleads actual knowledge by the defendant. The plaintiffs didn’t initially plead a 1595 case. Cases are already going up on appeal, so there will be a lot more law coming on these issues soon. * * *. THE MINDGEEK LITIGATION.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 28, 2022
Our first post on this topic, blogging the dispute over the @OMGFacts Twitter account , was over ten years ago!) Finally, in a footnote, he notes that he doesn’t want to speculate about the possibility that the injunction can be modified to provide for “joint management and control” of the Instagram account.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 2, 2022
Contact me if you are willing to teach this topic to my Internet Law students, because today I have no clue how to help them understand the CFAA. Judge Denies Facebook’s Request for Judgment on the Pleadings and Strikes Power.com Counterclaims — Facebook v. As my list of open issues shows, we know very little about the CFAA right now.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 11, 2022
Maxwell Goss also has an earlier post this year on the same topic that was published by The Michigan Law Journal. Fisher & Phillips’ David Walton provides a five-step action plan for making sure your bases are covered if you are filing a claim under the DTSA. Is there a circuit split on the enforceability of forum selection clauses?
Trading Secrets
DECEMBER 29, 2022
In addition to the differences in definitions and forms of relief, properly pleading a DTSA claim gives rise to federal jurisdiction, which allows for filing in removal to federal court and subjects the proceedings the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure instead of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 29, 2022
In addition to the differences in definitions and forms of relief, properly pleading a DTSA claim gives rise to federal jurisdiction, which allows for filing in removal to federal court and subjects the proceedings the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure instead of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Trading Secrets
JUNE 3, 2022
This blog post summarizes some of the significant decisions grouped by the hot topics below. Sufficiency of Trade Secret Pleadings and Allegations of Misappropriation. 2021), the Third Circuit addressed the pleading requirements to assert a claim under Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). In Oakwood Lab’ys LLC v. Thanoo , 999 F.3d
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JANUARY 11, 2022
The letter discusses the BPCIA and the Hatch-Waxman Act frameworks (for small molecule drugs) and sets forth several topics for USPTO’s consideration and further discussion: engagement between FDA and USPTO to increase efficiencies, possible misuse of the patent system (e.g., Alvotech hf. See -2289 Dkt.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 18, 2023
Between the two decisions, we get a powerful opinion on the topic of “aiding and abetting” online, while Section 230 dodged its first SCOTUS review. Even so, I was confused about the court’s position here.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Barton Beebe’s empirical work on this topic. Although Goldsmith’s lawyers pleaded the discovery rule ( id. Such result-oriented reasoning is usually considered improper, but arguably it is appropriate when the statutory question is whether or not a particular use is “fair.”) [Eric’s comment: I note Prof. of America v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content