Remove topics substantial-evidence
article thumbnail

Czech court finds that AI tool DALL-E cannot be the author of a copyright work

The IPKat

However, the Court noted that the claimant failed to substantiate this allegation within any evidence (beyond their own witness evidence), and consequently failed to meet the burden of proof for showing authorship. The claimant did not therefore have legal standing to bring the claim in question.

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Are Gummy Vitamins Related to Personal Care Products Under Section 2(d)?

The TTABlog

Examining Attorney Yat Sye Lee submitted internet evidence that some eighteen different companies offer the goods of both applicant and registrant under the same mark (including SEPHORA, BATH & BODY WORKS, and PACIFICA), along with twenty use-based third-party registrations covering these goods. In re Salvation Nutraceuticals Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Still, the guidelines spend some time on the requirements of a prima facie case; the necessity of both evidence and reasoning to support any obviousness rejection; and consideration of all evidence before the examiner. However, it is evident that the term is no longer understood in a rigid or formalistic way. Firepass Corp.,

Art 121
article thumbnail

Jury Instructions and Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness: Federal Circuit Grants New Trial in Inline Plastics v. Lacerta

Patently-O

27, 2024), involved patents relating to tamper-resistant and tamper-evident food containers. An instructional error that is deemed “harmless” in light of the evidence and other instructions will stand. The case, Inline Plastics Corp. Lacerta Group, LLC , No. 2022-1954 (Fed.

article thumbnail

Predicting Eligibility

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch I have really enjoyed reading the new article by Professors Rantanen and Datzov providing empirical evidence that eligibility outcomes are now quite predictable. Rob Merges on the topic. If you recall though, in Bilski the Supreme Court offered no decision making framework beyond suggesting a case by case approach.

article thumbnail

EU law: Generative AI, copyright infringements and liability – My guess for a hot topic in 2024

Kluwer Copyright Blog

It does seem like the topic of AI and copyright was everywhere in the copyright world last year. While some digital topics have been known to cause a great commotion in copyright circles only to later sink practically without a trace, unless I am mistaken, the issue of the copyright implications of AI is different.

article thumbnail

Event Report: BIE Symposium raises questions on Arrow declarations in the UPC

The IPKat

After this, they discussed a set of various topics related to the RoP and the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA). Another topic related to the way judges interpret the RoP, as these leave some room for the judges to apply their national interpretation norms. Also the intricacies of the French saisie procedure were discussed.