Remove topics testing-requirements
article thumbnail

Bitcoin’s File Format protectable in copyright: a Wright decision?

Kluwer Copyright Blog

overturned the High Court decision in which Mr Justice Mellor found that the Bitcoin File Format (the “BFF” ) was not a protectable work in a copyright sense as it did not satisfy the fixation requirement under s.3(2) The Court of Appeal disagreed and considered that the BFF did satisfy the fixation requirement. 3(2) of the Act.

Copyright 113
article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Still, the guidelines spend some time on the requirements of a prima facie case; the necessity of both evidence and reasoning to support any obviousness rejection; and consideration of all evidence before the examiner. Flexibility in the scope of the prior art also extends to the analogous arts test. Master Lock Co., 3d 1231 (Fed.

Art 120
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Issue(s) Whether the district court oversimplified the claims under step one of the Alice tests. The district court further denied Sanderling’s motion for reconsideration.

Invention 130
article thumbnail

British Institute of International and Comparative Law launches online IP courses

The IPKat

It also allows them to explore some of the most topical developments facing copyright law today. Day 1 focuses on the nature and rationale of copyright, as well as requirements and scope of protection. It also allows them to explore some of the most topical developments facing trade marks and designs today.

Law 89
article thumbnail

Opinion of the European Copyright Society on certain selected aspects of Case C-227/23, Kwantum Nederland and Kwantum België

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Article 2(7) introduces a material reciprocity test, limiting copyright protection for works of applied art not protected in their country of origin. In our view, the CJEU could either recognize material reciprocity as a requirement of Union law or declare Member States’ rules mirroring Berne’s reciprocity clause as compatible with EU law.

article thumbnail

Only Humans are Inventive?

Patently-O

Patent Act was amended in 2011 to expressly require that inventors be “individuals.” In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. Here, there is no ambiguity: the Patent Act requires that inventors must be natural persons; that is, human beings.

article thumbnail

Recommended Reading: Professors Farley and Ramsey: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression"

The TTABlog

Ramsey of the University of San Diego School of Law have just published an article on a very timely topic: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression," 72 American University Law Review 1179 (2023). One current example is the speech-protective test first articulated by the Second Circuit in Rogers v.