Remove Fair Use Remove Ownership Remove Publishing
article thumbnail

St. Art Foundation v. Acko General Insurance: Decoding Street Art, Fair use and Moral rights

SpicyIP

2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. 52(1)(t); and (ii) if yes, whether the proviso of the same or ‘fixation requirement’ excludes it from the scope of fair use. Lastly, I will discuss the argument of moral rights of the author in contending the ‘fair use exemption’ of their work.

article thumbnail

Hachette Book Group v Internet Archive: Archiving Access to Information or Strengthening Copyright Laws?

SpicyIP

Discussing the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive, our fellowship applicant Tanishka Goswami explains the implication of the decision on fair use. Through this post, I shall: firstly , examine the Appellate Court’s “fair use” analysis w.r.t.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Authors & Copyright Scholars Back ‘Internet Archive’ in Landmark Legal Battle

TorrentFreak

Publishers vs. Internet Archive The self-scanning service is different from the licensing deals other libraries enter into. Not all publishers are happy with IA’s approach which triggered a massive legal battle two years ago. The publishers didn’t listen to these concerns.

Copyright 118
article thumbnail

IPSC Panel 14 – Copyright Authorship & Ownership

43(B)log

Atlantic Monthly first published Twain’s work, credited to him alone, in 1874. Twain thought he should have ownership of his lectures—“my lecture was my property.” No evidence of express consent; is telling it in front of him implied consent for him to publish it in his name w/no payment? Did Twain make fair use?

article thumbnail

Matricide, Movies and Salinger

Dear Rich IP Blog

I have read that the "change of ownership" of this collection is considered a publication. The library wants money to use these items in our play/movie. Does paying the library for their use put the burden of ownership/copyright on them? Transfer of ownership ≠ transfer of copyright. Is that correct?

article thumbnail

People Don’t Come to See the Tattoo, They Come to See the Show

IP Tech Blog

Because ownership of original works, like a tattoo, vests with the author (here the tattoo artist), the tattoo artist owned the copyright in the tattoo, even though it was physically on the someone else’s body. Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fair use. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. , Koons , 467 F.3d

article thumbnail

What if? Discussing the Elsevier Ltd. And Ors v Alexandra Elbakyan and Ors in the Multiverse of Substantive Copyright Arguments

SpicyIP

SpicyIP intern Tanvi Agarwal brings us up to date on the last two orders (see here and here ) regarding amendments that the defendants wanted in the written statement, and the dismissal of the application to reject the plaint. Tanvi is a second-year student pursuing BA LLB at the National University of Juridical Sciences.