Remove topics merely-descriptive
article thumbnail

Ferragamo did not infringe Audrey Hepburn’s image/personality rights by stating that its shoes were originally designed for her

The IPKat

The description available on its website concerning the history of the shoe – which was created in 1954 for Audrey Hepburn – was found to be lawful. The Florence court considered that the use made of Hepburn’s name by Ferragamo was in accordance with honest practices. The same was concluded for the other shoe models.

article thumbnail

Czech court finds that AI tool DALL-E cannot be the author of a copyright work

The IPKat

DALL-E is a text-to-image model developed by OpenAI to generate digital images from natural language descriptions, called "prompts." Background The claimant in this case, which is anonymised in the Court's judgment, had asked the AI program DALL-E to create an image for the claimant's website. contractual) protections to prevent this.

Copyright 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Dutch IP battle about the hyped “Crompouce®”- a croissant-tompouce hybrid

The IPKat

Regarding the trademark, the combination of two descriptive elements typically results in a descriptive sign, unless an unusual variation is introduced (CJEU 12 February 2004, C-265/00, Biomild, EU:C:2004:87, § 39, 43). Indeed, in mere days/weeks, Crompouce® apparently has become a common name in the trade for the relevant pasty.

article thumbnail

The Cologne Cathedral is not Neuschwanstein

The IPKat

The absolute ground of refusal of descriptive trade marks (now Art. The absolute ground of refusal of descriptive trade marks (now Art. Consumers would understand the term ‘KÖLNER DOM’ merely as an indication of the topic or subject of the goods but not as their commercial origin. The latter found that Art.

Art 62
article thumbnail

TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of "LETTERS & NUMBERS" for. Guess What?

The TTABlog

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark LETTERS & NUMBERS (in standard character form) on the Supplemental Register, finding it to be generic for printed and electronic publications "in the field of educational and entertainment materials targeted to children on the topic of alphanumeric characters and symbols."

article thumbnail

First substantive decision of the UPC Court of Appeal overturns preliminary injunction in NanoString v 10x Genomics (UPC_CoA_335/2023)

The IPKat

However, the UPC CoA also found that the description and the drawings should be used as an aid to determine the scope of protection of the claims (and not just resolve ambiguities in the literal claim wording). The description included examples in which cell and tissue samples were processed (e.g.

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

Thus, contrary to the recent Nature article on this topic, AI is not breaking patent law. This is not merely an assumption on which the EPC was drafted. If an applicant wished to acknowledge the AI inventor out of fairness, they are free to do this in the description (r. It is the ordinary meaning of the term inventor".